Philosophy of science: an existential turn

Authors

  • Ilya T. Kasavin Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Vladimir N. Porus National Research University – Higher School of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202360452

Keywords:

existential philosophy of science, life-meaning values, boundary situations, weber's dilemma, types of existential situations in science

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the identification and analysis of existential dimensions of science, i.e., the dependence of consciousness, activity and communication of scientists on special forms of scientific culture - life-meaning universals (existentials). The article outlines the contours of the problem field of existential challenges rooted in the real life of modern science, in the crisis of the Enlightenment idea of scientific progress, in the mismatch of the norms and ideals of scientists with everyday ideas and needs. The origins of the theoretical formulation of the existential problems of science are found in the dilemma of profession and vocation (M. Weber). This is a controversy that problematizes the relationship between the scientist’s desire for objective knowledge, on the one hand, and the human dimension of scientific activity and communication, on the other. The article singles out the particular types of existing, or boundary situations in science, in which the experiences of scientists are ordered and problematized in relation to archetypal values - freedom, objectivity, creativity, rationality, truth, success, as well as in relation to such ontological categories as space and time, which reveal their value-ladeness. The subjective dimension of science, in which a personality manifests herself as overcoming internal conflicts, a free and thinking being, qualifies as the subject of an emerging research trend - the existential philosophy of science.

Published

2024-02-01

How to Cite

[1]
2024. Philosophy of science: an existential turn. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 60, 4 (Feb. 2024), 7–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202360452.