FEYERABEND'S EPISTEMOLOGY OF MYSTERY AND METAPHYSICS

Authors

  • Emile Alexandrov Школа перспективных исследований ТюмГУ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202562231

Keywords:

Epistemology of Mystery, Metaphysics, Feyerabend, Aristotle, Ineffability, Scientific Realism

Abstract

This paper explores Paul Feyerabend's epistemology of mystery, tracing its evolution from his earlier epistemological anarchism to its culmination in a metaphysics that emphasises the ineffability of ultimate reality. Feyerabend's critique of scientific materialism, rooted in his rejection of rigid methodological rules, highlights the historical interplay of rational and irrational elements in scientific progress. Drawing on Aristotle's conception of metaphysics as free and divine, the paper examines the dynamic relationship between Being and knowing in dialogue with Feyerabend's pluralistic approach. Our analysis shows Feyerabend's insistence on the contingent and narrative nature of human knowledge aligning with the Greek recognition of ineffability while diverging in its rejection of metaphysical absolutism. Feyerabend's later metaphysics embraces change, multiplicity, and the interconnectedness of human practices and Being, challenging the reductionism of scientific realism. Feyerabend's 'manifest reality' shaped by cultural and historical conditions likely betrays the influence of Frege's formal systems on his thought, exemplified in his critique of Parmenides' monism. The study further discusses Feyerabend's dynamic metaphysics in light of Pseudo-Dionysius's influence, emphasising ultimate reality as unknowable yet responsive to human engagement. By juxtaposing these perspectives, a renewed engagement with metaphysics in contemporary philosophy is warranted. Such a renewed focus highlights metaphysics' role in challenging epistemological constraints, fostering an understanding of reality that integrates ontology and epistemology. Ultimately, the paper positions Feyerabend's work as a bridge between classical metaphysics and modern philosophical inquiry, challenging the dominance of reductionist frameworks and advocating for a pluralistic, narrative-rich approach to science and epistemology. 

References

Aristotle. J. Barnes (ed.) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Bollingen Series 71:2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.

Alfarabi. Alfarabi’s Book of Dialectic (Kitāb al-Jadal): On the Starting Point of Islamic Philosophy. Translated by David M. DiPasquale. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Brown, M.J. “The Abundant World: Paul Feyerabend’s Metaphysics of Science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2015, vol. 53, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.015.

Feyerabend, P.K. Farewell to Reason. London: Verso, 1987.

Feyerabend, P.K. “Gods and Atoms: Comments on the Problem of Reality”, in: D. Cicchetti and W.M. Grove (eds.), Thinking Clearly About Psychology, vol. 1: Matters of Public Interest. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991, pp. 91–99.

Feyerabend, P.K. Against Method. 3rd ed. London: Verso, 1993.

Feyerabend, P.K. Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

Feyerabend, P.K. Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction Versus the Richness of Being. Ed. by B. Terpstra. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

Frege, G. “Begriffsschrift, a Formula Language, Modeled Upon That of Arithmetic, for Pure Thought,” in: J. van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967, pp. 1–82.

Hansen, M.J. “Parmenides B6.1–2 without a Modal Fallacy,” Aporia, 2011, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–10.

Hartshorne, C. Creative Experiencing: A Philosophy of Freedom. Ed. by D.W. Viney and J.O. Albany. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011.

Kidd, I.J. “Feyerabend, Pseudo-Dionysius, and the Ineffability of Reality,” Philosophia, 2012, vol. 40, pp. 365–377.

Kidd, I.J. “Feyerabend on the Ineffability of Ultimate Reality,” in: J. Diller and A. Kasher (eds.), Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities. Netherlands: Springer, 2013, pp. 849–859.

Lewis, F.A. “Parmenides’ Modal Fallacy,” Phronesis, 2009, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852808X375228.

Mueller, I. Simplicius: On Aristotle On the Heavens 3.1–7. London: Duckworth, 2009.

Parmenides of Elea. Fragments. Ed. and trans. by D. Gallop. Supplementary volume 18. Phoenix. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991. Plotinus, 2018 – Plotinus. The Enneads. Ed. by L.P. Gerson. Trans. by G. BoysStones, J.M. Dillon, L.P. Gerson, R.A.H. King, A. Smith, and J. Wilberding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Proclus. The Elements of Theology: A Revised Text with Translation, Introduction, and Commentary. 2nd ed. Trans. by E.R. Dodds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963. 300 p.

Pseudo-Dionysius. The Complete Works. Trans. by

C. Luibheid. Foreword, notes, and translation collaboration by P. Rorem. Preface by R. Roques. Introductions by J. Pelikan, J. Leclercq, and K. Froehlich. New York: Paulist Press, 1987.

Rhodes, M.C. Mystery in Philosophy: An Invocation of PseudoDionysius. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, Rowman & Littlefield Publishing, 2012.

Published

2025-06-27

How to Cite

[1]
2025. FEYERABEND’S EPISTEMOLOGY OF MYSTERY AND METAPHYSICS . Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 62, 2 (Jun. 2025), 208–226. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202562231.