FEYERABEND: AN APOLOGY FOR A NONCONFORMIST

Authors

  • Liana A. Tukhvatulina Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202461351

Keywords:

Feyerabend, science, scientific realism, expertise, science in a free society

Abstract

This is a review of selected chapters from the book “Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays” (ed. by K. Bschirr & J. Shaw). The choice of the papers for the review is justified by two main trajectories of the reception of Feyerabend’s ideas in the contemporary philosophy of science and epistemology: his criticism of the approach to the self-presentation of science and criticism of scientific modernity. The polemical thesis formulated on the basis of the review is that Feyerabend’s interpretation has an apologetic orientation. His methodological views are interpreted as consonant with the values of scientific realism and scientific progress. The analysis of his project for science in a free society emphasizes its significance for the interests of science itself.

References

Barsegyan, H. “Feyerabend’s General Theory of Scientific Change,” in: Bschirr, K. & Shaw, J. Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 57–71.

Brown, M. “Against Expertise: A Lesson from Feyerabend’s ‘Science in a Free Society?’,” in: Bschirr, K. & Shaw, J. Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 191–212.

Chang, H. Is Water H₂O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.

Chang, H. “The Coherence of Feyerabend’s Pluralist Realism,” in: Bschirr, K. & Shaw, J. Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 40–56.

Kidd, I.J. “Why Did Feyerabend Defend Astrology? Integrity, Virtue, and the Authority of Science,” Social Epistemology, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2015.1031851.

Kidd, I.J. “Feyerabend, Science and Scientism,” in: Bschirr, K. & Shaw, J. Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 172–190.

Mitchell, S. “The Prescribed and Proscribed Values in Science Policy,” in: Machamer, P. and Wolters, G. (eds.). Science, Values, and Objectivity. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2004, pp. 245–255.

Roe, S. “A Way Forward for Citizen Science: Taking Advice from a Madman,” in: Bschirr, K. & Shaw, J. Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 213–230.

Wray, K.B. “Feyerabend’s Theoretical Pluralism: An Investigation of the Epistemic Value of False Theories,” in: Bschirr, K. & Shaw, J. Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 72–88.

Published

2024-09-26

How to Cite

[1]
2024. FEYERABEND: AN APOLOGY FOR A NONCONFORMIST. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 61, 3 (Sep. 2024), 212–220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202461351.