FEYERABEND AND KUHN ON MONISM AND PLURALISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202461347Keywords:
Feyerabend, Kuhn, monism, pluralism, normal science, dogmatism, paradigmAbstract
Feyerabend had many interlocutors in his controversial career, and one of them was Kuhn. One key point of contention in their interaction was the divergence between the monism inherent in Kuhnian normal science and Feyerabend’s pluralism about the content and methodology of science and other systems of knowledge. In this paper, I offer my perspective on this disagreement. After presenting Feyerabend’s critique of Kuhn, I argue that the disagreement between Kuhn and Feyerabend on this point was not as radical as it may appear. Feyerabend respected the autonomy of diverse cultural and epistemological traditions, and such traditions are often monistic within themselves, in the manner of Kuhnian normal science. On the other hand, Kuhnian revolutions require the presence of competing paradigms at least during periods of extraordinary science. I propose a pluralist position that can accommodate local monism but ultimately recommends going beyond monism for the purpose of productive interactions between different systems of practice. Such pluralism can incorporate the advantages of both Feyerabend’s liberal epistemology and Kuhn’s advocacy of disciplined normal science.
References
Chang, H., 2012. Is Water H₂O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Dordrecht: Springer.
Chang, H., 2021. “The Coherence of Feyerabend’s Pluralist Realism,” in: Bschir, K. and Shaw, J. (eds.) Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 40–56.
Feyerabend, P.K., 1962. “Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism,” in: Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.) Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, vol. 3 of the Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 28–97.
Feyerabend, P.K., 1970. “Consolations for the Specialist,” in: Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–230.
Feyerabend, P.K., 1975. Against Method. London: New Left Books.
Feyerabend, P.K., 1975. “How to Defend Society Against Science,” Radical Philosophy, vol. 11, pp. 3–8.
Feyerabend, P.K., 1978. Science in a Free Society. London: New Left Books.
Hoyningen-Huene, P., 1995. “Two Letters of Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kuhn on a Draft of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 26, pp. 353–387.
Hoyningen-Huene, P., 2006. “More Letters by Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kuhn on Proto-Structure,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 37, pp. 610–632.
Kent, R., 2024. Paul Feyerabend and the Critique of Scientific Ideology. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge (forthcoming), 2024.
Kuhn, T.S., 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T.S., 1970. “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?,” in: Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–23.
Kuhn, T.S., 1970. “Reflections on My Critics,” in: Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231–278.
Lakatos, I., 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in: Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–196.
Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A., 1970. (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lloyd, E.A., 1987. “Feyerabend, Mill, and Pluralism,” Philosophy of Science, Supplement, vol. 64, pp. 396–407.
Oberheim, E., 2006. Feyerabend’s Philosophy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Popper, K.R., 1970. “Normal Science and Its Dangers,” in: Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–58.
Preston, J., 1997. Feyerabend: Philosophy, Science and Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Shaw, J., 2018. A Pluralism Worth Having: Feyerabend’s Well-Ordered Science. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Philosophy, Western University.
Watkins, J., 1970. “Against ‘Normal Science’,” in: Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–37.
