FEYERABEND’S RELATIONSHIP TO THE LIBERAL ART OF GOVERNMENT: COMMENTS ON STEPHEN TURNER ON FREE EXCHANGE AND COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202461343Keywords:
Feyerabend, J.S. Mill, political transformative experience, liberal art of government, witnessing truth, philosophy of science, open exchangeAbstract
This paper challenges Stephen Turner’s reading of Feyerabend’s Science in a Free Society. In particular, according to Turner, Feyerabend’s “critique represents a recognition that the regimes of science and expertise are ineradicably political and coercive. But if regimes of science and expertise are ineradicably political and coercive, what remains is the problem of our choice of regimes, and how to accommodate them in a democratic order.” This paper shows that by stretching the meaning of coercion so widely, Turner has misrepresented Feyerabend’s position. In fact, the paper argues that Feyerabend offers a vision of liberal politics and science that can be made uncoercive, or at least worth having. In particular, this paper offers a new reading of Feyerabend’s account of ‘free exchange’ as an immanent critique of J.S. Mill’s liberalism. The paper concludes by diagnosing some tensions in Feyerabend’s vision and thereby also criticize Turner.
References
Bagg, Samuel Ely. The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2023.
Cowling, M. Mill and Liberalism, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
DiZerega, G. “Democracy as a Spontaneous Order,” Critical Review, 1989, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 206–240.
Feyerabend, P. Science in a Free Society. London: Verso, 1982.
Feyerabend, P. Against Method, 3rd ed. London and New York: Verso, 1993.
Jacobs, S. “Misunderstanding John Stuart Mill on Science: Paul Feyerabend’s Bad Influence,” The Social Science Journal, 2003, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 201–212.
Kukathas, C. The Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Kusch, M. “Relativism in Feyerabend’s Later Writings,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2016, vol. 57, pp. 106–113.
Lewis, P. “Emergent Properties in the Work of Friedrich Hayek,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2012, vol. 82, no. 2–3, pp. 368–378.
Lloyd, E.A. “Feyerabend, Mill, and Pluralism,” Philosophy of Science, 1997, vol. 64, no. S4, pp. S396–S407.
Paul, L.A. Transformative Experience. Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2014.
Pitts, J. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
Schliesser, E. “Book Review Bad Beliefs: Why They Happen to Good People by Levy, Neil. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2022, vol. 35 (2), pp. 189–203.
Shaw, J. “Feyerabend’s Well-Ordered Science: How an Anarchist Distributes Funds,” Synthese, 2021, vol. 198, pp. 419–449.
Staley, K.W. “Logic, Liberty, and Anarchy: Mill and Feyerabend on Scientific Method,” The Social Science Journal, 1999, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 603–614.
Von Humboldt, W. The Limits of State Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
