SOCIAL SCIENCE AS A PROJECT: EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCE OF CHANGING CONTEXTS FOR SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202461233Abstract
It is increasingly common to conceive of scientific research as something that can be planned, managed, and assessed by applying modern techniques of project management. Expecting research to follow certain standardized procedures to achieve clearly defined goals has a long tradition, in particular, in the natural sciences and has arguably contributed to the acceptance of science as an authoritative force that makes tangible contributions to social progress. For the social sciences, however, such a narrow understanding of scientific research causes serious problems. Social science research doesn’t always fit in the logic of project management. Moreover, attempts to adjust research practices to correspond with external, managerial experiences are far more consequential and damaging to the social sciences. This article interrogates the prospects and consequences of project thinking in the social sciences and discusses the likely epistemological consequences. To do so, it will recapitulate the historical and social developments that lead to the adoption of managerial principles in social science research and contrasts them with the philosophical principles that underpinned the scientification of thinking about the social.
References
Adorno, T., Albert H., Dahrendorf, R., Habermas, J., Pilot, H., Popper, K. The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. London: Heinemann, 1969.
Andreski, S. Social Sciences as Sorcery. London: Andre Deutsch, 1972.
Black, D. “On the Almost Inconceivable Misunderstandings Concerning the Subject of Value-Free Social Science”, British Journal of Sociology, 2013, vol. 64 (4), pp. 763–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12034
Brooks, H. “Applied Science and Technological Progress”, Science, 1967, 156 (3783), pp. 1706–1712. DOI: 10.1126/science.156.3783.1706.
Daston, L. “The Empire of Observation, 1600–1800”, in: L. Daston & E. Lunbeck (eds.) Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010, pp. 81–114. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226136790-005
Del Negro, P. “Venetian Policy Towards the University of Padua and Scientific Progress During the 18th Century” in: M. Feingold, V. Navarro-Brotons (eds.) Universities and Science in the Early Modern Period. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006, pp. 169–182.
DeSolla Price, D. Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press, 1963.
Fleming, P. Dark Academia. How Universities Die. London: Pluto Press, 2021.
Ginsberg, B. The Fall of the Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Giorgi, A. Psychology as a Human Science Revisited. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 40 (3), pp. 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167800403005
Horkheimer, M. Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Continuum, 1982.
Iggers, G.G. “Further Remarks about Early Uses of the Term ‘Social Science’”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1959, vol. 20 (3), pp. 433–436. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708121
Jessop, B. “On Academic Capitalism”, Critical Policy Studies, 2017, vol. 12 (1), pp. 104–109.
Kasavin, I. “Philosophical Realism: The Challenge for Social Epistemologists”, Social Epistemology, 2015, vol. 29 (4), pp. 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2014.971913
Kasavin, I. “Towards a Social Philosophy of Science: Russian Prospects”, Social Epistemology, 2017, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2016.1227389.
Kasavin, I. “Gift versus Trade: On the Culture of Science Communication”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2019, vol. 49 (6), pp. 453–472.
Kasavin, I. “Science as a Political Agent”, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2020, no. 7, pp. 3–14.
Kasavin, I. A Social Philosophy of Science. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2023.
Lea, D. “The Managerial University and the Decline of Modern Thought”, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2011, vol. 43 (8), pp. 816–837.
Lee, D. “The Society of Society: The Grand Finale of Niklas Luhmann”, Sociological Theory, 2000, vol. 18 (2), pp. 320–330.
Marcuse, H. One-Dimensional Man. Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. London, New York: Routledge, 2001.
McLauchlan, G. and Hooks, G. “Last of the Dinosaurs? Big Weapons, Big Science, and the American State from Hiroshima to the End of the Cold War”, Sociological Quarterly, 1995, vol. 36, pp. 749–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1995.tb00463.x
Mirowski, P. Machine Dreams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Mirowski, P. Science Mart. Privatizing American Science. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011.
Moon, J.D. “Understanding and Explanation in Social Science”, Political Theory, 1977, vol. 5 (2), pp. 183–198.
Musgrave, R. “Social Goods and Social Bads”, in: R. Marris (ed.) The Corporate Society. London: Macmillan, 1974, pp. 251–193.
Polanyi, M. Science, Faith and Society. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1964.
Ruser, A. “Sociological Quasi-Labs: The Case for Deductive Scenario Development”, Current Sociology, 2015, vol. 63 (2), pp. 170–181.
Schwalbe, K. An Introduction to Project Management. 5th Edition, CreateSpace Independent Publishing, 2015.
Stichweh, R. “The Sociology of Scientific Disciplines: On the Genesis and Stability of the Disciplinary Structure of Modern Science”, Science in Context, 1992, vol. 5 (1), pp. 3–15. DOI: 10.1017/S0269889700001071.
Weber, M. “Objectivity in Social Science and Social Policy”, in: E.A. Shils, H.A. Finch (eds.) The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press, 1949.
Whitehead, A.N. Science and the Modern World. New York: The Free Press, 1925.
Whitehead, A.N. Process and Reality. An Essay in Cosmology. New York: The Free Press, 1929.
