Analytical truths in R. Carnap’s theory in natural language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202461115Keywords:
analytical truths, formal semantics, Carnap, situation semantics, possible worldsAbstract
The article presents a critical semantic analysis of the so-called analytical truths as they were discussed by R. Carnap and building on some new empirical data that are not fully satisfactorily explained by Carnap's theory. A theoretical reconstruction of Carnap's theory of analytical truths is proposed. It is demonstrated how his understanding of analytical truths, as statements that are true in all possible worlds and amenable to a quite obvious definition on a par with the concepts of sense (meaning) and synonymy, applies exclusively to artificial languages of logic. Therefore, Carnap’s theory remains unreachable for the well-known criticism of W. Quine, who, in turn, pointed out the difficulties in defining these concepts for natural languages. A theoretical reconstruction of Carnap's explication of the mentioned concepts in the theory of meaning for natural languages is carried out. The connection of Carnap's approach with the perspective of contemporary formal semantics is established. Subsequently, problematic cases and the difficulties they pose for Carnap's concept are examined. An explanation is proposed for analytical truths as containing in their logical form an (unpronounced) quantifier over possible worlds (situations).
References
Burton-Roberts, N. “Generic Sentences and Analyticity”, Studies in Language, 1977, vol. 1, pp. 155–196.
Carnap R. “Meaning Postulates”, Philosophical Studies, 1952, vol. 3, pp. 65–73.
Carnap, R. “Meaning and Synonymy in Natural Languages”, Philosophical Studies, 1955, vol. 6, pp. 33–47.
Carnap, R. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Vol. 30. University of Chicago Press, 1988.
Cohen, A. “On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars”, Journal of Semantics, 2001, vol. 18, issue 3, pp. 183–209.
Frege, G. “Sense and Reference”, The Philosophical Review, 1948, vol. 57(3), pp. 209–230.
Frege, G. Ischislenie ponyatiy, yazyk formul chistogo myshleniya, postroennyy po obraztsu arifmeticheskogo [Begriffsschrift: eine der arithmetische nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens], in: G. Frege. Logika i logicheskaya [Logic and Logical Semantics]. Moscow: Aspekt-Press, 2000, pp. 65–142. (Trans. into Russian)
Heim, I., Kratzer, A. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998.
Kratzer, A. “The Notional Category of Modality”, in: H.-J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (eds.), Words, Worlds, and Context. Vol. 6. Walter de Gruyter, 1981, pp. 38–74.
Kratzer, A. “Conditionals”, Chicago Linguistics Society, 1986, vol. 22(2), pp. 1–15.
Kratzer, A. “Modality”, in: A.von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1991, pp. 639–650.
Krifka, M. “Definitional Generics”, in: M. Alda; C. Beyssade; and F. del Prete (eds.) Genericity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 372–389.
Kripke, S. “Naming and Necessity”, in: Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Springer, 1972, pp. 253–355.
Lewis, D. “Adverbs of Quantification”, in: E. Keenan (ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge University Press, 1975, pp. 3–15.
Montague, R. “The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English”, in: J. Hintikka, J. Matthew, E. Moravcisk, and P. Suppes (eds.) Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht: Springer, 1973, pp. 221–242. Reprinted in: P. Portner and B. Partee (eds.). Formal Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 17–34.
Putnam, H. “Meaning and Reference”, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 70, no. 19, 1973, pp. 699–711.
Quine, W.V.O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, Philosophical Review, 1951, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 20–43.
Quine, W.V.O. Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1960.
Quine, W.V.O. Mathematical Logic. Cambridge, 1981 (1940).
Quine, W.V.O. “Indeterminacy of Translation Again”, The Journal of Philosophy, 1987, vol. 84(1), pp. 5–10.
Russell, B. “On Denoting”, Mind, 1905, vol. 14, no. 56, pp. 479–493.
Russell, B. “Mr. Strawson on Referring”, Mind, 1957, vol. 66, no. 263, pp. 385–389.
Strawson, P.F. “On Referring”, Mind, 1950, vol. 59, no. 235, pp. 320–344.
Vostrikova E., Kusliy P. “Otkryvaya logicheskii analiz yazyka zanovo” [Rediscovering the Logical Analysis of Language], Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2016, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 8–20.
