Complementarity or Incommensurability? Reply to critical remarks

Authors

  • Alexandr M. Dorozhkin National Research Lobachevsky State University
  • Svetlana V. Shibarshina National Research Lobachevsky State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5840/eps20236018

Keywords:

philosophy and methodology of science, creativity, scientific problem, epistemological randomization, complementary

Abstract

The article provides a reply to critical remarks made during the discussion about creativity and scientific knowledge. The authors propose to consider their concept of creativity not as antagonistic or incommensurable with the alternative, but rather co-existing through the complementarity principle. Responding to a comment about the socio-cultural conditionality of a particular cognitive situation, the authors question whether globalization seriously influence this matter in science. They support the statement about the importance of the interaction between science and art, science and philosophy as an opportunity to consider scientific problems from the outside, in an unusual way. Regarding the comment about serendipity, the authors note that in certain cases we need exactly epistemological randomization, since we cannot consciously induce serendipity. In conclusion, thanks are expressed to all participants in the discussion.

Published

2023-05-11

How to Cite

[1]
2023. Complementarity or Incommensurability? Reply to critical remarks. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 60, 1 (May 2023), 76–81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5840/eps20236018.