Contextualism and the problem of knowledge ascription

Authors

  • Ekaterina Vostrikova Interregional Non-Governmental Organization “Russian Society for History and Philosophy of Science”
  • Petr Kusliy Interregional Non-Governmental Organization “Russian Society for History and Philosophy of Science”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202158464

Keywords:

contextualism, knowledge ascriptions, semantics, philosophy of language

Abstract

The paper explores the contextualist approach towards the semantics of knowledge ascriptions. The authors discuss the relevance of these studies in semantics for the major issues in virtue epistemology. It is argued that despite the advantages that contextualism has over its alternatives (in particular, relativism and subject sensitive invariablisism), it still requires a more elaborated compositional semantics that it currently has. We review several concrete contextualsit proposals to the semantics of the verb know in light of their applicability to the well-known type of examples known as the fake barn example, point out some of their particular shortcomings, and propose a revision, which represents a variant of D. Lewis’s general approach to the semantics of "know".

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

[1]
2021. Contextualism and the problem of knowledge ascription. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 58, 4 (Dec. 2021), 110–126. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202158464.