Criteria for Replication of Psychological Knowledge in the Context of the Cultural-Historical Epistemology

Authors

  • Natalya E. Kharlamenkova Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202158227

Keywords:

cultural-historical epistemology, psychological knowledge, criteria for knowledge replication, description, interpretation, explanation, individual psychological differences

Abstract

The author considers some methodological problems of contemporary psychological research in the context of the concept of cultural-historical epistemology, as it is represented in the paper by B.I. Pruzhinin and T.G. Shchedrina. The author claims that the key problem of the modern science lies not in the question of how to conduct research correctly, but how to express the results so that another scientist can reproduce them. What are the criteria for their validity and reliability? With this problem in the background, it becomes obvious that there is a fundamental gap between the theoretical and methodological part of a particular study and the description of the selection and methods, the organizing procedure for empirical research, and the analysis of the results. Scientists’ attention is focused on the development and implementation of empirical research, while the actual production and reproduction of knowledge happen to be outside the scope of solving research problems. In the latter case, we mean the entire procedure for the reproduction of knowledge, including the theoretical and methodological substantiation of the novelty and relevance of the research, the empirical part of the scientific work itself, and, of course, the cultural-historical interpretation of the results, or, more correctly, their reasonable explanation. The problem of psychological knowledge replication is considered in the article. Also, the criteria for the replication of knowledge at various points of scientific and psychological research are discussed, in particular – the criteria of constancy and renewal of knowledge in experimental situations, which presuppose the conceptual setting of the studied phenomena, and of the facts’ correlation from different experiments (including the conceptualization of their continuity with the historical tradition of psychological science). Considerable attention is paid to the specific object field of psychological science and, thereby, to the analysis of such scientific procedures as description, interpretation and explanation. Especially, the methodological arguments are analyzed which make it possible to introduce the procedure for explaining scientific data into the criteria system for the replication of psychic phenomena.

Published

2021-06-19

How to Cite

[1]
2021. Criteria for Replication of Psychological Knowledge in the Context of the Cultural-Historical Epistemology. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 58, 2 (Jun. 2021), 51–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202158227.