Wittgenstein and Husserl as the reformers of social science

Authors

  • Alexander A. Sanzhenakov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202057338

Keywords:

Wittgenstein, Husserl, rule-following problem, sociology of science, ethnomethodology, life-world

Abstract

The article is devoted to the rule-following problem and its impact on the sociology of science as K.A. Rodin presents them in his article. It is known that L. Wittgenstein in “Philosophical Studies”, using the rule of arithmetic addition as an example, formulated the rule-following problem, which has acquired the ultimate form of skepticism thanks to S. Kripke. This problem was transferred to the sociology of science by D. Bloor, where it received the following sociological explanation: rule-amenably activity can be understood only by incorporating rules into social institutions. P. Winch rejected a skeptical interpretation of this problem, and as K.A. Rodin shows in the article, most adequately showed the consequences of Wittgenstein's ideas for sociology. In his answer, A.A. Sanzhenakov draws attention to two circumstances. Firstly, sociology was influenced not only by late but also early ideas of Wittgenstein. Secondly, the rule-following problem as an important factor in the sociological turn can also be found in the phenomenology of E. Husserl. The author concludes about the need for additional research, which will draw a line between the influence of Wittgenstein and Husserl on sociology.

Published

2020-12-22

How to Cite

[1]
2020. Wittgenstein and Husserl as the reformers of social science. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 57, 3 (Dec. 2020), 40–43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202057338.