Counter-expertise: Opening and Closing the Black Boxes

Authors

  • Asya A. Filatova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202057220

Keywords:

counter-expertise, science facts, black boxes, Bruno Latour, STS, local knowledge, matters of facts and matters of concern

Abstract

The term “counter-expertise” has recently become a part of the STS theoretical tools, although main topics covered by this term have been the STS subjects for several decades. These themes concern the norms and practices of laypeople participation in assessing the quality of their living conditions. This assessing often clashes with official expertise. First of all, the problem of counter-expertise is considered in the context of the democratization of science, a participatory turn and activism. In this article, using the vocabulary of B. Latour's actor-network theory, I try to demonstrate the way counter-experts use, open and close the so-called “black boxes” of science. The counter-experts’ attitude about scientific facts is a matter of principle, for it actualizes the problem of demarcation of counter-expertise from various kinds of grassroots initiatives, which are usually interpreted as unscientific and socially destructive.

Published

2020-05-27

How to Cite

[1]
2020. Counter-expertise: Opening and Closing the Black Boxes. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 57, 2 (May 2020), 48–57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202057220.