Deciphering Hume: Life, Times and Heritage of the Reformer of Metaphysics

Authors

  • Evgeniy N. Blinov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202057115

Keywords:

David Hume, empiricism, skepticism, Modern metaphysics, personal identity, theories of causality, Vadim Vassiliev

Abstract

The present article analyzes an ambitious attempt to revisit and reevaluate Hume’s metaphysical project in the early 21th century, proposed by Vadim Vasilyev. His claim is to demonstrate that the problems raised by the author of Treatise of Human Nature and Enquiry concerning Human Understanding are far from being completely resolved and could provide us some valuable hints into the problems of contemporary analytical metaphysics. Against a widespread consensus that the evolution in Hume's had been insignificant, Vasilyev maintains that his philosophical project underwent crucial transformations. He provides evidence of a gradual shift from a radical empiricism to a moderate rationalism by re-examining some classical problems of Hume’s studies and providing a critical analysis of the problems of causality and personal identity. This review provides some arguments for and against Vasilyev's claims.

Published

2020-05-27

How to Cite

[1]
2020. Deciphering Hume: Life, Times and Heritage of the Reformer of Metaphysics. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 57, 1 (May 2020), 202–215. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202057115.