D. BOHM'S REALISM AND HOLISM: THE SYSTEM OF METAPHORS AND DIFFERENCES FROM THE LINES OF N. BOHR AND W. HEISENBERG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202663345Keywords:
interpretations of quantum mechanics, Bohm's theory, Bohm's philosophy, holism, implicit and explicit order, realismAbstract
Bohmian mechanics is the leading non-local realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics. Its development and defense against objections (by V. Allori, B. Hiley, and others) constitute a distinct field at the intersection of physics and the philosophy of science. The aim of this work is to examine, in the context of current debates on quantum realism, the scientific and philosophical ideas of D. Bohm in their interconnection. The novelty of the article includes: a characterization of D. Bohm's epistemology, his system of metaphors, as well as a comparative analysis of his metaphysics with the philosophical concepts of N. Bohr and W. Heisenberg. In his epistemology, Bohm combines realism with the view that our knowledge is limited. In the case of a single particle, its trajectory can be visualized; for a hundred particles, this is practically impossible. Similarly, in metaphysics, the world is real, but at the deep level of the implicate order it is only partially knowable for us. It is emphasized that Bohm possesses a genuine system of mutually complementary metaphors that elucidate his metaphysics: besides the holographic one, these are “the fish in the aquarium”, “the drop of ink”, and “the radio signal to the ship”. The metaphor of the radio signal to the ship in mechanics demonstrates an informational, rather than a force-based, influence on the particle. In metaphysics, it acquires a broader meaning: information guides the development of macro-objects. In the philosophy of physics, D. Bohm's dynamic holism is contrasted with N. Bohr's epistemological line and Heisenberg's Pythagorean line (A. Plotnitsky). Bohr also recognizes holism, but it is the holism of particle, apparatus, and observer. In Bohm, holism has an ontological, universal character, rather than being fragmented according to the observer's standpoint. For Heisenberg, symmetries expressed in equations lie at the foundation of reality; for Bohm, however, the meaning and significance of equations are merely an isolated aspect of a unified whole, a manifestation of active information from it. These three lines represent three answers to the question of the foundation of physical reality.
References
Абрамов П.Д., Некрасова В.М. Реализм и холизм научной теории волны-пилота и философии Дэвида Бома // Философия науки. 2024. № 4 (104). С. 34–50.
Бом Д. Квантовая теория. М.: Наука, 1965. 728 c.
Бор Н. Избранные научные труды в двух томах. Т. 2. М.: Наука, 1971. 676 с.
Гейзенберг В. Физика и философия. Часть и целое. М.: Наука, 1989. 400 с.
Ровелли К. Гельголанд. Красивая и странная квантовая физика. М.: Эксмо, 2020. 176 с.
Салом И. Нобелевская премия 2022 года по физике и конец механистического материализма Часть 2: Реализм и локальность // Идеи и идеалы. 2024. Т. 16. № 4–1. С. 141–166.
Терехович В.Э. Три подхода к проблеме квантовой реальности и вторая квантовая революция // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2019. Т. 56. № 1. С. 169–184.
Терехович В.Э. Квантовая революция или революционные трансформации? // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2025. Т. 62. № 4. С. 6–24.
Фурсов А.А. Обзор статьи Э. Гибни «Исследование Nature показало, что физики широко расходятся во взглядах о том, что квантовая механика говорит о реальности» // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2025. Т. 62. № 4. С. 222–230.
Эрекаев В.Д. Квантовая механика и современная философия: Онтология микромира и квантовое сознание. М.: URSS, 2023. 168 с.
Abramov, P.D., Nekrasova, V.M. “Realizm i holizm nauchnoj teorii volny-pilota i filosofii Djevida Boma” [Realism and Holism of the Scientific Theory of the Pilot Wave and the Philosophy of David Bohm], Philosophy of Science, 2024, no. 4 (104), pp. 34–50. (In Russian)
Allori, V. “On Quantum Mechanics and the Pilot-Wave Theory: Empirical Equivalence and Other Objections”, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2025, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 133–150.
Bell, J.S. “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox”, Physics, 1964, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 195–200.
Bell, J.S. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bohm, D. Kvantovaja teorija [Quantum Theory]. Moscow: Nauka, 1965. (Trans. into Russian)
Bohm, D. “Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables. II”, Physical Review, 1952, vol. 85, pp. 180–193.
Bohm, D. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Taylor and Francis e-Library, 2005.
Bohm, D. “A New Theory of the Relationship of Mind and Matter”, Philosophical Psychology, 1990, vol. 3, no. 2–3, pp. 271–286.
Bohm, D., Hiley, B.J. The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. Routledge, 1993.
Bohm, D. “Kvantovaya teoriya” [Quantum Theory]. Moscow: Nauka, 1965. (Trans. into Russian)
Bohr, N. Izbrannye nauchnye trudy v dvuh tomah. T. 2 [Selected Scientific Works in Two Volumes. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Nauka, 1971. (Trans. into Russian)
Erekaev, V.D. Kvantovaja mehanika i sovremennaja filosofija: Ontologija mikromira i kvantovoe soznanie [Quantum Mechanics and Modern Philosophy: Ontology of the Microworld and Quantum Consciousness]. Moscow: URSS, 2023. (In Russian)
Nichol, L. (ed.) The Essential David Bohm. London: Routledge, 2005.
Fursov, A.A. “Obzor stat’i Je. Gibni ‘Issledovanie Nature pokazalo, chto fiziki shiroko rashodjatsja vo vzgljadah o tom, chto kvantovaja mehanika govorit o real’nosti’” [Review of E. Gibney’s Paper ‘Physicists Disagree Wildly on What Quantum Mechanics Says about Reality, Nature Survey Shows’], Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2025, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 222–230. (In Russian)
Heisenberg, W. Fizika i filosofija. Chast’ i celoe [Physics and Philosophy. Part and Whole]. Moscow: Nauka, 1989. (In Russian)
Gibneys, E. “Physicists Disagree Wildly on What Quantum Mechanics Says about Reality, Nature Survey Shows”, Nature, 2025, vol. 643, pp. 1175–1179.
Globus, G. “Mind, Matter and the Implicate Order by Paavo TI Pylkkänen”, NeuroQuantology, 2007, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 396–399.
Hiley, B.J., Van Reeth, P. “Quantum Trajectories: Real or Surreal?”, Entropy, 2018, vol. 20, no. 5, 353.
Maddox, J.B., Bittner, E.R. “Quantum Relaxation Dynamics Using Bohmian Trajectories”, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2001, vol. 115, no. 14, pp. 6309–6316.
Plotnitsky, A. “Heisenberg’s Pythagorean Revolution: from Quantum Jumps to Matrix Algebra and Beyond”, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2025, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 25–42.
Pylkkänen, P. Mind, Matter and the Implicate Order. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
Rovelli, K. Gel’goland. Krasivaja i strannaja kvantovaja fizika [Helgoland. The Beautiful and Strange Quantum Physics]. Moscow: Eksmo, 2020. (Trans. into Russian)
Salom, I. “Nobelevskaja premija 2022 goda po fizike i konec mehanisticheskogo materializma” [The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics and the End of Mechanistic Materialism. Part 2: Realism and Locality], Ideas and Ideals, 2024, vol. 16, no. 4–1, pp. 141–166. (In Russian)
Sivasundaram, S., Nielsen, K.H. “Surveying the Attitudes of Physicists Concerning Foundational Issues of Quantum Mechanics”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.00676, 2016.
Terekhovich, V.E. “Tri podhoda k probleme kvantovoj real’nosti i vtoraja kvantovaja revoljucija” [Three Approaches to the Problem of Quantum Reality and the Second Quantum Revolution], Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2019, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 169–184. (In Russian)
Terekhovich, V.E. “Kvantovaja revoljucija ili revoljucionnye transformacii?” [Quantum Revolution or Revolutionary Transformations?], Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2025, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 6–24. (In Russian)
Teufel, S., Dürr, D. Bohmian Mechanics: The Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Theory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009.
Zeilinger, A. “A Foundational Principle for Quantum Mechanics”, Foundations of Physics, 1999, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 631–643.
