BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL: HOW ACCEPTABLE IS FRAUD IN SCIENCE?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202562232Keywords:
Steve Fuller, Galileo Galilei, Paul Feyerabend, scientific fraud, falsification, scientific ethicsAbstract
The article is a review of selected passages from Steve Fuller’s recent book “To Justice and To Justify: Profiles of the Academic Vocation”. The main focus is on the epistemological aspects of Galileo Galilei’s scientific activity, whose counter-inductive methods of providing evidence for the heliocentric model of the world can, from a modern perspective, be regarded as typical scientific fraud. Various forms of scientific falsifications and unintentional cases of misinformation are analyzed through key historical examples, ranging from Gregor Mendel’s selection experiments and Robert Millikan’s oil-drop experiment to the scandals involving Hwang Woo-Suk and Hendrik Schön. The article explores the different motivations of scientists who engage in dishonest data manipulation. It raises the question of the possible ways and limits of legitimizing fraud actions in science.
References
Галилей Г. Диалог о двух системах мира // Избр. труды: в 2 т. Т. 1. М.: Наука, 1964. С. 97–562.
Никифоров А.Л. Философия науки: история и теория. М.: Идея-Пресс, 2010.
Фейерабенд П. Против метода. Очерк анархистской теории познания. М.: АСТ, 2007.
Флек Л. Возникновение и развитие научного факта: введение в теорию стиля мышления и мыслительного коллектива. М.: Идея-Пресс, 1999.
Cyranoski, D. “Crunch Time for Korea’s Cloners”, Nature, 2004, vol. 429, pp. 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/429012a
Cyranoski, D. “Korea’s Stem-cell Stars Dogged by Suspicion of Ethical Breach”, Nature, 2004, vol. 429, p. 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/429003a
Feyerabend, P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoi teorii poznaniya [Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge]. Moscow: AST, 2007. (Trans. into Russian)
Feynman, R.P. “Cargo Cult Science”, Engineering and Science, 1974, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 10–13. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechES:37.7.CargoCult
Fuller, S. To Judge and To Justify: Profiles of the Academic Vocation. Springer, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76017-4
Galilei, G. “Dialog o dvukh sistemakh mira” [Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems], Izbrannye trudy v 2 tomakh, Tom 1 [Selected papers in 2 vols., vol. 1]. Moscow: Nauka, 1964, pp. 97–562. (Trans. Into Russian)
Kim, L. “Explaining the Hwang Scandal: National Scientific Culture and its Global Relevance”, Science as Culture, 2008, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430802515023
Levi, B.G. “Investigation Finds that One Lucent Physicist Engaged in Scientific Misconduct”, Physics Today, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 15–17. https://doi.org/10.1063/ 1.1534995
Nikiforov, A.L. Filosofiya nauki: istoriya i teoriya [Philosophy of Science: History and Theory]. Moscow: Idea-Press, 2010. (In Russian)
Service, R.F. “Physicist Fired for Falsified Data”, Science, 2002. https://www.science.org/content/article/physicist-fired-falsified-data
Fleck, L. Vozniknovenie i razvitie nauchnogo fakta: vvedenie v teoriyu stilya myshleniya i myslitel’nogo kollektiva [Entstehung und Entwicklung einer Wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv]. Moscow: Idea-Press, 1999. 220 p. (In Russian)
