DEFENDING INFORMATIONAL STRUCTURAL REALISM: THE VIEW OF ALTERNATIVES

Authors

  • Ivan A. Karpenko HSE University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202562230

Keywords:

scientific realism, structural realism, information, informational structural realism, epistemic structural realism, ontic structural realism, duality, philosophy of science

Abstract

The paper analyzes some varieties of structural realism and proposes an expanded version of information structural realism (ISR). The version of non-eliminative ontic structural realism (OSR), which accepts entities and structures as ontological primitives and denies the existence of theoretical objects, is criticized. Arguments are given from the field of philosophy of science and physics (scientific realism, quantum mechanics and its information interpretation, digital ontology, string model tools) in favor of the fact that ISR, which asserts information as a fundamental reality, avoids the problems faced by existing approaches, in particular, by expanding ISR with the idea of alternative descriptions of reality (models) equivalent to each other. It is shown that fundamentally different theories (based on different space-time metrics) actually give the same description of reality, and, consequently, make the same predictions regarding the observed behavior of physical systems. Moreover, they, being equivalent, initially imply different visions of the fundamental structure, for example, with a different number of spatial dimensions. The philosophical interpretation of these results is that what is fundamental is not the traditionally understood physical reality (with substantial space-time as its main attribute), but the descriptions themselves, expressed in the form of alternative models – scientific representations of reality. Since they are the only ones available for research when it comes to the unobservable, the thesis that theoretical objects exist as ontological primitives becomes justified. Thus, it is proven that information itself is real and fundamental, being a tool and subject of research. 

References

Головко Н.В., Эртель И.И. Онтический структурный реализм: онтология паттернов и модальная природа структур // Сибирский философский журнал. 2020. Т. 18. № 4. С. 5–29.

Карпенко И.А. Критика солипсизма в контексте многомировых моделей // Философия науки и техники. 2021. Т. 26. № 1. С. 78–90.

Мамчур Е.А. Объективность науки и релятивизм (к дискуссиям в современной эпистемологии). М.: ИФ РАН, 2004. 242 с.

Мамчур Е.А. Информационно-теоретический поворот в интерпретации квантовой механики. Философско-методологический анализ // Вопросы философии. 2014. № 1. С. 57–71.

Мамчур Е.А. В поисках информационной интерпретации квантовой механики // Vox: Философский журнал. URL: https://vox-journal.org/ content/Vox20/Vox20-MamchurE.pdf (дата обращения: 13.03.2025).

Прись И.Е. Эффективный онтический структурный реализм и контекстуальный реализм. Философия науки. 2024. Т. 2. № 101. С. 69–91.

Терехович В.Э. Структуры, объекты и реальность. Часть 1 // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2022. Т. 59. № 3. С. 166–184.

Терехович В.Э. Структуры, объекты и реальность. Часть 2 // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2023. Т. 60. № 1. С. 149–165.

Фурсов А.А. Научный реализм и развитие теории суперструн // После постпозитивизма / Под. ред. И.Т. Касавина, И.Д. Невважай, Л.В. Шиповаловой, Д.С. Артамонова. М.: РОИФН, 2022. C. 27–32.

’t Hooft, G. “Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity”, Cornell University Archives, 1993. [httрs://arxiv.org/рdf/ gr-qc/9310026v2.рdf, accessed on 09.12.2024]

Becker, K., Becker, M., Schwarz, J. String theory and M-theory: A Modern Introduction. New York; Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Bekenstein, A. “Black Holes and the Second Law”, Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, 1972, vol. 4, no. 15, pp. 99–104.

Beni, M.D. “Epistemic Informational Structural Realism”, Minds & Machines, 2016, vol. 26, pp. 323–339.

Bynum, T.W., “On the Possibility of Quantum Informational Structural Realism”, Minds and Machines, 2014, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 123–139.

Cao, T.Y. “Structural Realism and the Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory”, Synthese, 2003, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 3–24.

Chakravartty, A. “Semirealism”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 1998, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 391–408.

Chaly, V.A. “Nauchnyi perspektivizm: realizm, antirealizm ili novaya paradigma?” [Scientific perspectivism: realism, antirealism, or a new paradigm?], Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2022, vol. 70, pp. 80–90. (In Russian)

Demopoulos, W., Friedman, M. “Critical Notice: Bertrand Russell’s The Analysis of Matter: Its Historical Context and Contemporary Interest”, Philosophy of Science, 1985, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 621–639.

Esfeld, M., Lam, V. “Ontic structural realism as a metaphysics of objects”, in: A. Bokulich, P. Bokulich (eds.). Scientific Structuralism. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 281. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, pp. 143–159.

Floridi, L. “Informational Realism”, 2003. [https://philpapers. org/archive/FLOIR.pdf, accessed on 14.03.2025]

Floridi, L. “A Defense of Informational Structural Realism”, Synthese, 2008, vol. 161, pp. 219–253.

Floridi, L. “Against Digital Ontology”, Synthese, 2009, vol. 168, pp. 151–178.

Floridi, L. The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 405 p.

Fredkin, E. “An Introduction to Digital Philosophy”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2003, vol. 42, pp. 189–247.

French, S. “Eliminating Objects Across the Sciences”, in: T. Pradeu, A. Guay (eds.). Individuals Across the Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 371–394.

Fursov, A.A. “Nauchnyi realizm i razvitie teorii superstrun” [Scientific Realism and the Development of Superstring Theory], in: I.T. Kasavin, I.D. Nevvazhai, L.V. Shipovalova, D.S. Artamonov (eds.). Posle postpozitivizma [After Postpositivism]. Moscow: ROIFN, 2022, pp. 27–32. (In Russian)

Golovko, N.V., Ertel, I.I. “Onticheskii strukturnyi realizm: ontologiya patternov i modal’naya priroda struktur” [Ontical Structural Realism: The Ontology of Patterns and the Modal Nature of Structures], Sibirskii filosofskii zhurnal, 2020, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 5–29. (In Russian)

Hawking, S. “Particle Creation by Black Holes”, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 1975, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 199–220.

Karpenko, I. A. “Kritika solipsizma v kontekste mnogomirovykh modelei” [Criticism of solipsism in the contexts of many-world models], Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2021, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 78–90. (In Russian)

Ladyman, J. “An Apology for Naturalized Metaphysics”, in: M.H. Slater & Z. Yudell (eds.). Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: New Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 141–162.

Ladyman, J. “Structural Realism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2024. [https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/structuralrealism/, accessed on 09.12.2024]

Ladyman, J. Structural Realism and the Relationship between the Special Sciences and Physics, Philosophy of Science, 2008, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 744–755.

Lektorsky, V. A. “Epistemological Realism and Cognitive Science”, Global Philosophy, 2023, vol. 33, no. 6, article number 49.

Lloyd, S. Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos. New York: Vintage, 2007.

Long, B. “ISR Is Still a Digital Ontology”, Erkenntnis, 2020, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 649–664.

Maldacena, J. “The Large N Limit of Suрerconformal Field Theories and Suрergravity”, International Journal of Theoretical Рhysics, 1999, vol. 38, no. 4, рр. 1113–1133.

Mamchur, E.A. Ob”ektivnost’ nauki i relyativizm (k diskussiyam v sovremennoi epistemologii) [The Objectivity of Science and Relativism (towards Discussions in Modern Epistemology)]. Moscow: IPh RAS, 2004. (In Russian)

Mamchur, E.A. Informatsionno-teoreticheskii povorot v interpretatsii kvantovoi mekhaniki. Filosofsko-metodologicheskii analiz [Information-Theoretic Twist in Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Philosophical and Methodological Analysis], Voprosy Filosofii, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 57–71. (In Russian)

Mamchur, E.A. “V poiskakh informatsionnoi interpretatsii kvantovoi mekhaniki” [In a Search for Information Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics], Vox, 2016 [https://vox-journal.org/content/Vox20/Vox20-MamchurE.pdf, accessed on 13.03.2013]. (In Russian)

Maxwell, G. “Theories, Perception and Structural Realism”, in: R. Colodny (ed.). The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1970, pp. 3–34.

Newman, M.H.A. “Mr. Russell’s Causal Theory of Perception”, Mind, 1928, vol. 37, no. 146, pp. 137–148.

Poincaré, H. “La valeur de la science”, Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l’Etranger, 1905, vol. 60, pp. 415–423.

Polchinski, J. String Theory, vol. 2: Superstring Theory and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Pris, I.E. “Effektivnyi onticheskii strukturnyi realizm i kontekstual’nyi realism” [Effective Ontic Structural Realism and Contextual Realism], Filosofiya nauki, 2024, vol. 2, no. 101, pp. 69–91.

Psillos, S. “Is Structural Realism Possible?”, Philosophy of Science, 2001, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 13–24.

Ramsey, F. “Theories”, in: R.B. Braithwaite (ed.). The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1931, pp. 212–236.

Reck, E., Schiemer, G. “Structuralism in the Philosophy of Mathematics”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2023. [https:// plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/structuralism-mathematics/, accessed on 09.12.2024]

Rowbottom, D.P. “Scientific Realism: What It Is, the Contemporary Debate, and New Directions”, Synthese, 2019, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 451–484.

Schaffer, J. “Is There a Fundamental Level?”, Noûs, 2003, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 498–517.

Schmidhuber, J. “A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Everything”, in: C. Freksa (ed.) Foundations of Computer Science: Potential – Theory – Cognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer, 1997, pp. 201–208.

Sequoiah-Grayson, S., Floridi, L. “Semantic Conceptions of Information”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2022. [https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/information-semantic/, accessed on 14.03.2025]

Seiberg, N. “Emergent Spacetime”, in: Henneaux, M., Sevrin, A., Gross, D. (eds.). The Quantum Structure of Space and Time. 2007, Singapore: WSPC, pp. 163–213.

Susskind, L. “The World as a Hologram”, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 1995, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 6377–6396.

Terekhovich, V.E. “Struktury, ob”ekty i real’nost’. Chast’ 1” [Structures, Objects, and Reality. Part 1], Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2022, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 166–184. (In Russian)

Terekhovich, Vladislav E. “Struktury, ob”ekty i real’nost’. Chast’ 2” [Structures, Objects, and Reality. Part 2], Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2023, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 149–165. (In Russian)

van Fraassen, B.C. Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.

Votsis, I. “Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Structural Realism but were Afraid to Ask”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2011, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 227–276.

Votsis, I. The Epistemological Status of Scientific Theories: An Investigation of the Structural Realist Account. London School of Economics, 2004. [https://www.votsis.org/PDF/Votsis_Dissertation.pdf, accessed on 09.12.2004]

Wallace, D. “Stating Structural Realism: Mathematics‐first Approaches to Physics and Metaphysics”, Philosophical Perspectives, 2022, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 345–378.

Weizsacker, C. The Unity of Nature. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1980.

Wheeler, B. “How Realist Is Informational Structural Realism?”, Synthese, 2022, vol. 200, article number 480.

Wheeler, J. “Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links”, in: W. Zurek (ed.). Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley, 1990, p. 3–28.

Wolfram, S. A New Kind of Science. Champaign: Wolfram Media, 2002.

Worrall, J. “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?”, Dialectica, 1989, vol. 43, no. 1–2, pp. 99–124.

Yaghmaie, A. “On the Problem of Relation Without Relata”, Philosophical Investigations, 2021, vol. 14, no. 33, pp. 404–425.

Zuse, K. “Rechnender Raum”, Elektronische Datenverarbeitung, 1967, vol. 8, pp. 336–344.

Zwiebach, B. A First Course in String Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Published

2025-06-27

Issue

Section

Interdisciplinary Studies

How to Cite

[1]
2025. DEFENDING INFORMATIONAL STRUCTURAL REALISM: THE VIEW OF ALTERNATIVES . Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 62, 2 (Jun. 2025), 190–207. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202562230.