HOW IS IT GOING WHEN ANYTHING GOES? REFLECTIONS ON PAUL FEYERABEND AND THE POSTFACTUAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5840/Keywords:
classical conception of knowledge, post-truth, social constructivism, scientific authorityAbstract
In his seminal book *Against Method*, Paul Feyerabend demanded that “science should be taught as one view among many and not as the one and only road to truth and reality”. Given the recent backlash against scientific authority, which includes persisting denial of climate science, vaccine scepticism and the wider debate about the dawning of a postfactual era, it seems that Feyerabend had his will. However, scientific authority was never unchallenged and in particular contemporary discussions about an alleged coming of post-factual times create the chimera of an enlightened era in which reason and facts dominated. In my paper I will reengage with the history of facts (Poovey) and address some of the problems that occur when scientific and non-scientific facts clash in the public realm.
References
Aronowitz, S. “The Politics of the Science Wars”, Social Text, 1996, vol. 46/47, pp. 177–197.
Boghossian, P. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Collins, H., Evans, R., Weinel, M. “STS as Science or Politics?”, Social Studies of Science, 2017, vol. 47 (4), pp. 580–586.
Dawkins, R. “Postmodernism Disrobed”, Nature, 1998, vol. 394, pp. 141–143.
Daston, L. “Marvelous Facts and Miraculous Evidence in Early Modern Europe”, Critical Inquiry, 1991, vol. 18 (1), pp. 93–124.
DeVries, J. “Bruno Latour, a veteran of the ‘science wars’, has a new mission”, Science, October 16, 2017. Available at: https://www.science.org/ content/article/bruno-latour-veteran-science-wars-has-new-mission
Duerr, H.-P. Paul Feyerabend: Briefe an einen Freund. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995.
Du Toit, C. “The Environmental Integrity of African Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Probing the Roots of African Rationality”, Indilinga – African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems, 2005, vol. 4 (1), pp. 55–73.
Ferretti, M. “Post-Factualism, Political Communication and the Role of Citizens”, in: N. Snow, M. Vaccarezza (eds.) Virtues, Democracy, and Online Media: Ethical and Epistemic Issues. New York: Routledge, 2021, pp. 224–240.
Feyerabend, P. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: New Left Books, 1975.
Feyerabend, P. “How to Defend Society Against Science”, Radical Philosophy, 1975, vol. 11, pp. 3–8.
Feyerabend, P. Farewell to Reason. London: Verso, 1987.
Firestein, S. Ignorance: How it Drives Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Friedmann, J. “The Epistemology of Social Practice: A Critique of Objective Knowledge”, Theory and Society, 1978, vol. 6 (1), pp. 75–92.
Kidd, I.J. “What’s so Great about Science? Feyeraebend on Science, Ideology, and the Cold War”, in: E. Aronova, S. Turchetti (eds.) Science Studies during the Cold War and Beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2016, pp. 55–76.
Laudan, L. “For Method: or, Against Feyerabend”, in: J.R. Brown, J. Mittelstrass (eds.) An Intimate Relation: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Presented to Robert E. Butts on his 60th Birthday. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989, pp. 299–317.
MacMullen, I. “What is ‘Post-factual’ Politics?”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 2020, vol. 28 (1), pp. 97–116.
Poovey, M. A History of the Modern Fact. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Preston, J., Munevar, G., Lamb, D. (eds.) The Worst Enemy of Science? Essays in Memory of Paul Feyerabend. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Ruser, A. “Hijacking the Postmodern Project: Post-Truth and the Need to De-politicize Epistemological Dispute”, Social Epistemology, 2021, vol. 35, pp. 1–10.
Shaw, J. “Feyerabend, Funding, and the Freedom of Science: The Case of Traditional Chinese Medicine”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2021, vol. 11 (2), pp. 1–27.
Twigger-Ross, C., Bonaiuto, M., Breakwell, G. “Identity Theories and Environmental Psychology”, in: M. Bonnes, T. Lee, M. Bonaiuto (eds.) Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues. New York: Routledge, 2003, pp. 203–233.
