THE EFFECT OF BIASED CONFIRMATION (SOME HISTORICAL AND SCIENTIFIC REMARKS ON STEVE FULLER’S PAPER)

Authors

  • Igor S. Dmitriev Saint Petersburg Branch of the S.I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology, Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202461460

Keywords:

Galileo, Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, Scientific Revolution, method of ultimate idealization

Abstract

This publication examines in a historical-scientific context some of the assertions and statements of S. Fuller’s article “Galileo’s truth: prolegomena to Feyerabendian research ethics” published in this issue of the journal. The main emphasis is placed on the critical analysis of the “logic of Galileo’s situation in the spirit of historical re-enactment” proposed by S. Fuller and “the lessons that Galileo would have drawn” from the situation of his time. The author of this article believes that the most controversial point in the work of S. Fuller, if we evaluate it from the historical-scientific point of view, is the construction of an extremely idealized model of Galileo’s personality and worldview and historical background without due consideration of what is currently known about the Italian scientist and his epoch.

References

Bacon, F. The Works, ed. by James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis, and Douglas Denon Heath. In 15 vols. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co., n.d.

Baldini, U. “L’astronomia del cardinale Bellarmino”, in: Paolo Galluzzi (ed.) Novità celesti e crisi del sapere. Florence: Giunti Barbèra, 1984, pp. 293–305.

Burrell, D.B. “Thomas Aquinas and Islam”, Modern Theology, 2004, vol. 20 (1), pp. 71–89.

Clavelin, M. “Conceptual and Technical Aspects of the Galilean Geometrization of the Motion of Heavy Bodies”, in: William R. Shea (ed.) Nature Mathematized, vol. I. Boston: D. Reidel, 1980, pp. 23–50.

Cohen, H.F. How Modern Science Came into the World: Four Civilizations, One Seventeenth-Century Breakthrough. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2010.

Coxhead, M.A. “A Close Examination of the Pseudo-Aristotelian Mechanical Problems: The Homology between Mechanics and Poetry as Technē”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2012, vol. 43A (2), issue 2, pp. 300–306.

Damerow, P., McLaughlin, P., Freudenthal, G., and Renn, J. Exploring the Limits of Preclassical Mechanics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992.

De Groot, J. “Aspects of Aristotelian Statics in Galileo’s Dynamics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2000, vol. 31A (4), pp. 645–664.

Dubarle, D. “Galileo’s Methodology of Natural Science”, in: Ernan McMullin (ed.) Galileo, man of science. New York: Basic Books, 1968, pp. 295–314.

Feldhay, R. Galileo and the Church: Political Inquisition or Critical Dialogue? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Feldhay, R. “Recent Narratives on Galileo and the Church: or The Three Dogmas of the Counter-Reformation”, Science in Context, 2000, vol. 13 (3–4), pp. 489–507.

Fuller, S. “Galileo’s Truth: Prolegomena to Feyerabendian Research Ethics”, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2024, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 73–96.

Galilei, G. Le Opere. Edizione Nazionale sotto gli auspicii di Sua Maestà il Re d’Italia. 20 vol. In 21. Direttore A. Favaro. Firenze: Tip. di G. Barbèra, 1890–1909.

Garber, D. “Why the Scientific Revolution Wasn’t a Scientific Revolution, and Why It Matters”, in: R. Richards, L. Daston (eds.) Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions at Fifty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016, pp. 133–148.

Gersh, St. “The Medieval Legacy From Ancient Platonism”, in: St. Gersh & M.J.F.M. Hoenen (eds.) The Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages. A Doxographic Approach. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2002, pp. 3–30.

Girill, T.R. “Galileo and Platonistic Methodology”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1970, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 501–520.

Heilbron, J.L. Galileo. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Purnell, Fr. (Jr.) “Jacopo Mazzoni and Galileo”, Physis: Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza, 1972, vol. 14 (3), pp. 273–294.

The Galileo Affair. A Documentary History: edited and translated with an introduction and notes by Maurice A. Finocchiaro. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.

Wallace, W. “Galileo and the Thomists”, in: Wallace W. Prelude to Galileo. Essays on Medieval and Sixteenth-Century Sources of Galileo’s Thought. Dordrecht; Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co; Hingham, MA, 1981, pp. 160–191.

Published

2024-12-05

Issue

Section

Epistemology and Cognition

How to Cite

[1]
2024. THE EFFECT OF BIASED CONFIRMATION (SOME HISTORICAL AND SCIENTIFIC REMARKS ON STEVE FULLER’S PAPER). Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 61, 4 (Dec. 2024), 97–116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202461460.