Самосохранение и преобразование природы: ответ Гарберу
Ключевые слова:
Фрэнсис Бэкон, Даниэл Гарбер, научный метод, прогресс в науках, спекулятивная философия, единство наук, полупарацельсианская космология, формы, скрытые процессы, самосохранение, аппетиты природы, трансформация тел, продление жизни
Аннотация
Гарбер демонстрирует недостатки популярной и идеализированной версии бэконовского научного метода путем внимательного прочтения второй книги "Нового Органона". Результаты анализа Гарбера показывают, что у Бэкона было не одна, а две философии, обе из которых были основаны на его теории материи и спекулятивной космологии. В данной статье рассматриваются возможные выводы из предложенной интерпретации бэконовской индукции в физике перенесенной на естественные науки в широком смысле, и обращается внимание на конечную цель философской программы Бэкона – продление жизни.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Литература
The Oxford Francis Bacon, ed. by G. Rees and L. Jardine. 15 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996-.
The Works of Francis Bacon, ed. by J. Spedding, R.L. Ellis, and D.D. Heath. vols. 1–7. London: Longman, Green, Reader and Dyer, 1859–64.
Fattori, M. Lessico del Novum organum di Francesco Bacone. Roma: Edizioni dellÁteneo & Bizzarri, 1980.
Fattori, M. "Nature Semplici in Francesco Bacone", Nouvelles de la République des Lettres, 1983, no. 1, pp.21–33.
Gemelli, B. “The History of Life and Death A 'Spiritual' History from Invisible Matter to Prolongation of Life”, Early Science and Medicine, 2012, vol. 17, no. 1/2, pp. 134–157.
Giglioni, G. “Francis Bacon”, in: P. Anstey (ed.) Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford University Press, 2013, pp.41–72.
Jalobeanu, D. The Art of Experimental Natural History: Bacon in Context. Bucharest: Zeta Books, 2015.
Kant, I. Kritik der Reinen Vernunft, 2nd ed. Riga, 1787.
Kodera, S. “The Art of Distillation of Spirits as a Technological Model for Human Physiology: The Cases of Marsilio Ficino, Joseph Duchene and Francis Bacon”, in: M. Horstmanshoff, H. King, and C. Zittel (eds.) Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe, Intersections, vol.25. Leiden: Brill, 2012, pp. 139–170.
McMullin, E. “Conceptions of Science in the Scientific Revolution”, in: D.C. Lindberg and R.S. Westman (eds.) Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 27–92.
McRae, R. “The Unity of the Sciences: Bacon, Descartes, and Leibniz”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1957, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 27–48.
Manzo, S. “Certainty, Laws and Facts in Francis Bacon’s Jurisprudence”, Intellectual History Review, 2014, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 457–478.
Newman, W. “Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn”, Osiris, 2014, vol. 29, no. 1, Chemical Knowledge in the Early Modern World, pp. 63–77.
Pérez-Ramos, A. “Bacon's Forms and the Maker's Knowledge Tradition”, in: M. Peltonen (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Bacon. Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 99–120.
Rees, G. “Francis Bacon's Semi-Paracelsian Cosmology”, Ambix, 1975, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 81–101.
Rees, G. “Matter Theory: A Unifying Factor in Bacon's Natural Philosophy?”, Ambix, 1977, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 110–125.
Rees, G. “An Unpublished Manuscript by Francis Bacon: Sylva Sylvarum Drafts and Other Working Notes”, Annals of Science, 1981, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 377–412.
Rees, G. “Francis Bacon and Spiritus Vitalis”, in: M. Fattori and M. Bianchi (eds.) Spiritus IV: Colloquio internazionale, 1983, pp. 265–81.
Rees, G., Upton, C. “Francis Bacon’s Natural Philosophy: a New Source. A transcription of Manuscript Hardwick 72A with translation and commentary”, BHSH, 1984, vol. 8, v+197 pp.
Rees, G. “Bacon's Speculative Philosophy”, in: M. Peltonen (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Bacon. Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp.121–145.
Rossi, P. “The Ant, The Spider and the Epistemologist”, in: M. Fattori (ed.) F. Bacon: terminologia e fortuna nel XVII secolo. Rome: Edizione dell’Ateneo, 1984, pp.245–260.
Serjeantson, R. “Francis Bacon and the ‘Interpretation of Nature’ in the Late Renaissance”, Isis, 2014, vol.105, no.4, pp. 681–705.
Vickers, B. “Francis Bacon and the Progress of Knowledge”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1992, vol. 53, no.3, pp. 495–518.
Walker, D.P. “Francis Bacon and Spiritus”, in: A. Debus (ed.) Science, Medicine, and Society in the Renaissance: Essays in Honor of Walter Pagel. London: Heinemann, 1972, 2 vols.
The Works of Francis Bacon, ed. by J. Spedding, R.L. Ellis, and D.D. Heath. vols. 1–7. London: Longman, Green, Reader and Dyer, 1859–64.
Fattori, M. Lessico del Novum organum di Francesco Bacone. Roma: Edizioni dellÁteneo & Bizzarri, 1980.
Fattori, M. "Nature Semplici in Francesco Bacone", Nouvelles de la République des Lettres, 1983, no. 1, pp.21–33.
Gemelli, B. “The History of Life and Death A 'Spiritual' History from Invisible Matter to Prolongation of Life”, Early Science and Medicine, 2012, vol. 17, no. 1/2, pp. 134–157.
Giglioni, G. “Francis Bacon”, in: P. Anstey (ed.) Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford University Press, 2013, pp.41–72.
Jalobeanu, D. The Art of Experimental Natural History: Bacon in Context. Bucharest: Zeta Books, 2015.
Kant, I. Kritik der Reinen Vernunft, 2nd ed. Riga, 1787.
Kodera, S. “The Art of Distillation of Spirits as a Technological Model for Human Physiology: The Cases of Marsilio Ficino, Joseph Duchene and Francis Bacon”, in: M. Horstmanshoff, H. King, and C. Zittel (eds.) Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe, Intersections, vol.25. Leiden: Brill, 2012, pp. 139–170.
McMullin, E. “Conceptions of Science in the Scientific Revolution”, in: D.C. Lindberg and R.S. Westman (eds.) Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 27–92.
McRae, R. “The Unity of the Sciences: Bacon, Descartes, and Leibniz”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1957, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 27–48.
Manzo, S. “Certainty, Laws and Facts in Francis Bacon’s Jurisprudence”, Intellectual History Review, 2014, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 457–478.
Newman, W. “Robert Boyle, Transmutation, and the History of Chemistry before Lavoisier: A Response to Kuhn”, Osiris, 2014, vol. 29, no. 1, Chemical Knowledge in the Early Modern World, pp. 63–77.
Pérez-Ramos, A. “Bacon's Forms and the Maker's Knowledge Tradition”, in: M. Peltonen (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Bacon. Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 99–120.
Rees, G. “Francis Bacon's Semi-Paracelsian Cosmology”, Ambix, 1975, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 81–101.
Rees, G. “Matter Theory: A Unifying Factor in Bacon's Natural Philosophy?”, Ambix, 1977, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 110–125.
Rees, G. “An Unpublished Manuscript by Francis Bacon: Sylva Sylvarum Drafts and Other Working Notes”, Annals of Science, 1981, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 377–412.
Rees, G. “Francis Bacon and Spiritus Vitalis”, in: M. Fattori and M. Bianchi (eds.) Spiritus IV: Colloquio internazionale, 1983, pp. 265–81.
Rees, G., Upton, C. “Francis Bacon’s Natural Philosophy: a New Source. A transcription of Manuscript Hardwick 72A with translation and commentary”, BHSH, 1984, vol. 8, v+197 pp.
Rees, G. “Bacon's Speculative Philosophy”, in: M. Peltonen (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Bacon. Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp.121–145.
Rossi, P. “The Ant, The Spider and the Epistemologist”, in: M. Fattori (ed.) F. Bacon: terminologia e fortuna nel XVII secolo. Rome: Edizione dell’Ateneo, 1984, pp.245–260.
Serjeantson, R. “Francis Bacon and the ‘Interpretation of Nature’ in the Late Renaissance”, Isis, 2014, vol.105, no.4, pp. 681–705.
Vickers, B. “Francis Bacon and the Progress of Knowledge”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1992, vol. 53, no.3, pp. 495–518.
Walker, D.P. “Francis Bacon and Spiritus”, in: A. Debus (ed.) Science, Medicine, and Society in the Renaissance: Essays in Honor of Walter Pagel. London: Heinemann, 1972, 2 vols.
Опубликован
2021-12-10
Как цитировать
Иориццо Д. Самосохранение и преобразование природы: ответ Гарберу // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2021. Т. 58. № 3. С. 47-56.
Раздел
Panel Discussion
