Вездесущность публичной науки
Ключевые слова:
общественное благо, наука для людей, технонаука, научное предприятие
Аннотация
Автор рассматривает науку вне бинарной оппозиции публичного и приватного, не как автономную или зависимую от государственного финансирования. В этой статье анализируются те аспекты, в которых наука, научное сообщество и научное предприятие всегда были и остаются публичными, служа общественному благу посредством производства, распространения и потребления технонаучных инноваций.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Литература
Agassi, J. Science and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Science. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1981, 536 pp.
Angell, M. The Truth About Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What To Do About It. New York: Random House, 2004, 319 pp.
Berman, E. “Not Just Neoliberalism: Economization in US Science and Technology Policy”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 2014, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 397‒431.
Fuller, S. Kuhn vs. Popper: the Struggle for the Soul of Science. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004, 160 pp.
Greenberg, D.S. Science for Sale: The Perils, Rewards, and Delusions of Campus Capitalism. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007, 324 pp.
Krimsky, S. Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? London and Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2003, 272 pp.
Lessig, L. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York: Penguin Press, 2008, 352 pp.
Mazzucato, M. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London, New York, Delhi: Anthem Press, 2014, 266 pp.
Merton, R.K. “The Normative Structure of Science”, in: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 267‒278.
Merton, R.K. On the Shoulders of Giants. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1965, 348 pp.
Mirowski, P. Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 2011, 464 pp.
Pew Research Center. How Scientists Engage the Public ttps://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/02/15/how-scientists-engage-public/, accessed on: 09.06.2020]
Polanyi, K. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press, 2014, 360 pp.
Raustiala, K. and Sprigman, C. The Knockoff Economy: How Imitation Sparks Innovation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012, 280 pp.
Sassower, R. Compromising the Ideals of Science. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Sassower, R. “The Neoliberal University and the Common Good”, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2019, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 90‒106.
Sassower, R.“Should Anyone Care about Scientific Progress?”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, May 2020. DOI:10.1177/0048393120916133.
Shapin, S. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeen-Century England. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2014, 512 pp.
Stengers, I. Another Science is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science, trans. by Stephen Muecke. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018, 220 pp.
Zuboff, S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs, 2019, 704 pp.
Angell, M. The Truth About Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What To Do About It. New York: Random House, 2004, 319 pp.
Berman, E. “Not Just Neoliberalism: Economization in US Science and Technology Policy”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 2014, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 397‒431.
Fuller, S. Kuhn vs. Popper: the Struggle for the Soul of Science. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004, 160 pp.
Greenberg, D.S. Science for Sale: The Perils, Rewards, and Delusions of Campus Capitalism. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007, 324 pp.
Krimsky, S. Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? London and Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2003, 272 pp.
Lessig, L. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York: Penguin Press, 2008, 352 pp.
Mazzucato, M. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London, New York, Delhi: Anthem Press, 2014, 266 pp.
Merton, R.K. “The Normative Structure of Science”, in: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 267‒278.
Merton, R.K. On the Shoulders of Giants. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1965, 348 pp.
Mirowski, P. Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 2011, 464 pp.
Pew Research Center. How Scientists Engage the Public ttps://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/02/15/how-scientists-engage-public/, accessed on: 09.06.2020]
Polanyi, K. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press, 2014, 360 pp.
Raustiala, K. and Sprigman, C. The Knockoff Economy: How Imitation Sparks Innovation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012, 280 pp.
Sassower, R. Compromising the Ideals of Science. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Sassower, R. “The Neoliberal University and the Common Good”, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2019, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 90‒106.
Sassower, R.“Should Anyone Care about Scientific Progress?”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, May 2020. DOI:10.1177/0048393120916133.
Shapin, S. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeen-Century England. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2014, 512 pp.
Stengers, I. Another Science is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science, trans. by Stephen Muecke. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018, 220 pp.
Zuboff, S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs, 2019, 704 pp.
Опубликован
2021-01-22
Как цитировать
Сассовер Р. Вездесущность публичной науки // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2021. Т. 57. № 4. С. 62-69.
Раздел
Panel Discussion
