ДЕНЬГИ НА НАУКУ: СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ФИНАНСИРОВАНИЯ НАУЧНОГО ПОИСКА
Ключевые слова:
НАУКА, ОБЩЕСТВО, ЭКОНОМИКА, ФИНАНСИРОВАНИЕ НАУКИ, ГРАНТЫ, РЫНОК
Аннотация
Cтатья представляет собой обзор вопросов, исследуемых сегодня в рамках темы «Наука и экономика». На примере анализа конкретных статей авторы демонстрируют существующие сегодня направления в исследовании вопросов финансирования науки. Представлены работы, исследующие специфическое влияние коммерциализации науки на результаты научной деятельности, а также исследующие разницу между этосом ученого и мировоззрением других участников общественной жизни. Анализируются взгляды ученых и представителей грантодающих организаций на процесс финансовой поддержки научных исследований.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Литература
Antonovski, A. Yu. “Nauka kak obshchestvennaya podsistema: Niklas Luman o mekhanizmakh sotsial’noi evolyutsii znaniya i istiny” [Science as a social
subsystem. Niklas Luhmann about mechanisms of social evolution of knowledge and truth], Voprosy filosofii, 2017, no. 7, pp. 158–171. (In Russian)
Barash, R. E., et.al. “‘Istina’ i ‘vlast’’ kak kategorii sotsial’noi filosofii” [“Truth” and “authority” as categories of social philosophy], Monitoring of public opinion : economic and social changes, 2017, no. 5, pp. 120–134. (In Russian)
Blumenthal, D. et al. “Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry”, in: New England journal of medicine, 1996, vol. 335, no. 23, pp. 1734-1739.
Boix Mansilla, V, Feller, I, Gardner H. “Quality assessment in interdisciplinary research and education”, in: Research Evaluation, 2006, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 69–74.
Brown, J.R. “Privatizing the university”, in: Science, 2000, vol. 290, no 5497, pp. 1701-1702.
Gök, A., Rigby, J., Shapira, P. “The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: Evidence from six smaller European countries”, in: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 715-730.
Hemlin, S. “Quality in science: Researchers’ conceptions and judgments”, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden. 1991.
Huutoniemi, K. “Communicating and compromising on disciplinary expertise in the peer review of research proposals”, in: Social Studies of Science, 2012, vol. 42 no. 6, pp. 897-921.
Lamont, M., Fournier, M., Guetzkow, J., Mallard, G., Bernier, R. “Evaluating creative minds: The assessment of originality in peer review”, in: Sales A., Fournier M. L. (eds.). Knowledge, Communication, and Creativity. London: Sage, 2007. P. 166–181.
Lamont, M. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009. 330 p.
Langfeldt, L. “The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments”, in: Research Evaluation, 2006, vol. 15, no 1, pp. 31–41.
Mirowski, P., Van Horn, R. “The contract research organization and the commercialization of scientific research”, in: Social studies of science, 2005, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 503-548.
Nelson, R.R. “Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities”, in: The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2001, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 13-19.
Partha, D., David, P.A. “Toward a new economics of science”, in: Research policy, 1994, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 487-521.
Petsko, G.A. “Goodbye, Columbus”, in: Genome biology, 2012, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 155-156.
Sà et al. “The Role of Evidence and Expertise in Research Funding Agencies”, in: Axelrod, P., Trilokekar R.D., Shanahan T., Wellen R. (eds.). Making Policy in Turbulent Times: Challenges and Prospects for Higher Education. Kingston: School of Policies Studies, Queen’s University, 2013. P. 59-82.
Stephan P.E. How economics shapes science. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 2012. 367 p.
Thorngate W., Dawes R.M., Foddy M. Judging Merit. New York: Psychology Press, 2009. 185 p.
subsystem. Niklas Luhmann about mechanisms of social evolution of knowledge and truth], Voprosy filosofii, 2017, no. 7, pp. 158–171. (In Russian)
Barash, R. E., et.al. “‘Istina’ i ‘vlast’’ kak kategorii sotsial’noi filosofii” [“Truth” and “authority” as categories of social philosophy], Monitoring of public opinion : economic and social changes, 2017, no. 5, pp. 120–134. (In Russian)
Blumenthal, D. et al. “Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry”, in: New England journal of medicine, 1996, vol. 335, no. 23, pp. 1734-1739.
Boix Mansilla, V, Feller, I, Gardner H. “Quality assessment in interdisciplinary research and education”, in: Research Evaluation, 2006, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 69–74.
Brown, J.R. “Privatizing the university”, in: Science, 2000, vol. 290, no 5497, pp. 1701-1702.
Gök, A., Rigby, J., Shapira, P. “The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: Evidence from six smaller European countries”, in: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 715-730.
Hemlin, S. “Quality in science: Researchers’ conceptions and judgments”, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden. 1991.
Huutoniemi, K. “Communicating and compromising on disciplinary expertise in the peer review of research proposals”, in: Social Studies of Science, 2012, vol. 42 no. 6, pp. 897-921.
Lamont, M., Fournier, M., Guetzkow, J., Mallard, G., Bernier, R. “Evaluating creative minds: The assessment of originality in peer review”, in: Sales A., Fournier M. L. (eds.). Knowledge, Communication, and Creativity. London: Sage, 2007. P. 166–181.
Lamont, M. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009. 330 p.
Langfeldt, L. “The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments”, in: Research Evaluation, 2006, vol. 15, no 1, pp. 31–41.
Mirowski, P., Van Horn, R. “The contract research organization and the commercialization of scientific research”, in: Social studies of science, 2005, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 503-548.
Nelson, R.R. “Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities”, in: The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2001, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 13-19.
Partha, D., David, P.A. “Toward a new economics of science”, in: Research policy, 1994, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 487-521.
Petsko, G.A. “Goodbye, Columbus”, in: Genome biology, 2012, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 155-156.
Sà et al. “The Role of Evidence and Expertise in Research Funding Agencies”, in: Axelrod, P., Trilokekar R.D., Shanahan T., Wellen R. (eds.). Making Policy in Turbulent Times: Challenges and Prospects for Higher Education. Kingston: School of Policies Studies, Queen’s University, 2013. P. 59-82.
Stephan P.E. How economics shapes science. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 2012. 367 p.
Thorngate W., Dawes R.M., Foddy M. Judging Merit. New York: Psychology Press, 2009. 185 p.
Опубликован
2018-05-27
Как цитировать
Вострикова Е. В., Куслий П. С. ДЕНЬГИ НА НАУКУ: СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ФИНАНСИРОВАНИЯ НАУЧНОГО ПОИСКА // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2018. Т. 55. № 1. С. 99-119.
Раздел
Vista
