ПРОЧТЕНИЕ ФЕЙЕРАБЕНДА: МЕЖДУ ФИЛОСОФИЕЙ НАУКИ, ГЕРМЕНЕВТИКОЙ И БОГОМ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202461346Ключевые слова:
Лакатос, Ницше, классическая филология, герменевтическая философия науки, онтологический плюрализмАннотация
В этом эссе я пытаюсь обосновать необходимость прочтения герменевтической философии науки вместе с Фейерабендом. Здесь также ставится вопрос о науке, который возникает и у Ницше, и в программных тезисах Фейерабенда о традиционной философии науки. В этом эссе, включающем обсуждение метода в истории, теологии и филологии, в том числе герменевтики Ницше, рассматривается переписка Фейерабенда с Лакатосом, а также сопротивление господствующей философии науки герменевтике как таковой. Обсуждение «богов» Фейерабенда включает в себя то, что он называет онтологическим изобилием, а также его неприятие ограниченной критики Парменида Поппером, требующей как исторического/историографического контекста, так и понимания науки на практике через контекстуализацию Шредингера, эпистемологию Платона, идеи Дюгема об эксперименте и теории познания, Ригля о стиле, решающих для понимания Фейерабендом понятия «прогресса», ключевых для Лакатоса и других в искусстве и науке.
Библиографические ссылки
Arnold, H. The Future of Email Archives: A Report from the Task Force on Technical Approaches for Email Archives. Council on Library and Information Resources, 2018.
Babich, B. “Material Hermeneutics and Heelan's Philosophy of Technoscience,” AI & Society, 2023, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 2177-2188.
Babich, B. “On the Very Idea of a Philosophy of Science: On Chemistry and Cosmology in Nietzsche and Kant,” Axiomathes, 2021, vol. 31, no. 6, (December, 2021), pp. 703-726.
Babich, B. Nietzsches Antike. Beiträge zur Altphilologie und Musik. Academia/Nomos Verlag, 2020.
Babich, B. “Hermeneutics and Its Discontents in Philosophy of Science: On Bruno Latour, the 'Science Wars', Mockery, and Immortal Models,” in: Babich, B. (ed.) Hermeneutic Philosophies of Social Science. De Gruyter, 2017.
Babich, B. and Ginev, D. The Multidimensionality of Hermeneutic Phenomenology. Springer, 2014.
Babich, B. “Friedrich Nietzsche,” in: Keane, N. and Lawn, C. (eds.) Blackwell Companion to Hermeneutics. Wiley, 2015, pp. 366–377.
Babich, B. “Hermeneutic Philosophy of Science,” in: Keane, N. and Lawn, C. (eds.) Blackwell Companion to Hermeneutics. Wiley, 2015, pp. 492-505.
Babich, B. “How to Talk About AIDS, Homeopathy, and Other Damned Things,” in: Ginev, D. (ed.) Critical Science Studies After Ludwik Fleck. 'St Kliment Ohridski' University Press, 2015, pp. 35-82.
Babich, B. “On Nietzsche's Judgment of Style and Hume's Quixotic Taste: On the Science of Aesthetics and 'Playing' the Satyr,” Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 2012, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 240-259.
Babich, B. “Towards a Critical Philosophy of Science: Continental Beginnings and Bugbears, Whigs, and Waterbears,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2010, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 343-392.
Bauer, H.H. Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method. University of Illinois Press, 1992.
Benne, C. Nietzsche und die historisch-kritische Philologie. De Gruyter, 2005.
Bearn, G.D.F. “Nietzsche, Feyerabend, and the Voices of Relativism,” Metaphilosophy, 1986, vol. 17, no. 2-3, pp. 135-152.
Blachowicz, J. “How Science Textbooks Treat Scientific Method: A Philosopher's Perspective,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2009, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 303-344.
Bos, J. “Nineteenth-Century Historicism and Its Predecessors: Historical Experience, Historical Ontology and Historical Method,” in: Bod, R., Maat, J. and Weststeijn, T. (eds.) The Making of the Humanities: From Early Modern to Modern Disciplines. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2012, pp. 131-147.
Burtt, E. A. “The Problem of Theological Method,” The Journal of Religion, 1947, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1-15.
Butterfield, H. The Whig Interpretation of History. Norton, 1931.
Castillo, M. “The Scientific Method: A Need for Something Better?” MJNR, 2013, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1669-1671.
Collodel, M. and Oberheim, E. (eds.) Feyerabend's Formative Years. Volume 1. Feyerabend and Popper. Springer, 2020.
Crombie, A.C. Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science, 1100-1700. Clarendon Press, 1971.
Dusek, V. “Lakatos between Marxism and the Hungarian Heuristic Tradition,” Studies in East European Thought, 2015, vol. 67, no. 1-2, pp. 61-73.
Feyerabend, P.; E. Oberheim and H. Heit (eds.), D. Lotter and A. Cross (trans.) Philosophy of Nature. Polity, 2016.
Feyerabend, P. Against Method. Introduced by Ian Hacking. Verso, 2010.
Feyerabend, P. Naturphilosophie. Suhrkamp, 2009.
Feyerabend, P.; B. Terpstra (ed.). The Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction versus the Richness of Being. University of Chicago Press, 1999.
Feyerabend, P. “It's Not Easy to Exorcise Ghosts,” Common Knowledge, 1997, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 98-123.
Feyerabend, P. Three Dialogues on Knowledge. Basil Blackwell, 1991.
Feyerabend, P. “More Clothes From the Emperor's Bargain Basement,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1981, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 57-71.
Feyerabend, P. Problems of Empiricism, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, 1981.
Feyerabend, P. “Fairytales From Australia,” Inquiry, 1977, vol. 20, pp. 372-397.
Feyerabend, P. Against Method. Verso, 1975.
Feyerabend, P. Wider den Methodenzwang. Frankfurt, 1975.
Feyerabend, P. “Consolations for the Specialist,” in: Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, 1970, pp. 197-230.
Feyerabend, P. “Philosophy of Science: A Subject with a Great Past,” in: Stuewer, R.H. (ed.) Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 5. University of Minnesota Press, 1970, pp. 172-183.
Feyerabend, P. “Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge,” in: Radner, M. and Winokur, S. (eds.) Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1970, vol. 4, pp. 17-130.
Franklin, J. “Science, Anti-Science, and Australian Realism,” in: Corrupting the Youth: A History of Philosophy in Australia. Macleay Press, 1977, pp. 313-344.
Gadamer, H.-G. Wahrheit und Methode. Mohr, 1960.
Ginev, D. Hermeneutic Realism Reality Within Scientific Inquiry. Springer, 2016.
Gauch, H.G.Jr. The Scientific Method in Practice. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Gavroglu, K., Goudaroulis, Y., and Nicolaccopoulos, P. (eds.) Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
Hacking, I. “Introduction to the Fourth Edition,” in: Feyerabend, P. Against Method. New Edition, Verso, 2010, pp. vii-xvi.
Halilović, E. “Feyerabend's Critique of Scientism,” Enrahonar, 1998, vol. 28, pp. 145-160.
Heelan, P.A.; B. Babich (ed.), Preface by Bitbol, M. The Observable: Heisenberg's Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Peter Lang, 2016.
Heelan, P. “Nietzsche's Perspectivalism: A Hermeneutic Philosophy of Science,” in: Babich, B. and Cohen, R.S. (eds.) Nietzsche, Epistemology, and Philosophy of Science: Nietzsche and the Sciences II. Kluwer, 1999, pp. 203-220.
Heelan, P. “Galileo, Luther, and the Hermeneutics of Natural Science,” in: Stapleton, T. (eds.) The Question of Hermeneutics. Springer, 1994, pp. 363-375.
Heelan, P. Space-Perception and the Philosophy of Science. University of California Press, 1983.
Heelan, P. “Hermeneutics of Experimental Science in the Context of the Life-World,” in: Ihde, D. and Zaner, R.M. (eds.) Interdisciplinary Phenomenology. Martinus Nijhoff, 1977, pp. 7-50.
Heelan, P. Quantum Mechanics and Objectivity: A Study of the Physical Philosophy of Werner Heisenberg. Martinus Nijhoff, 1965.
Khayyam, O. Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. Dulac, E. (illustrator), Fitzgerald, E. (trans.). Hodder and Stoughton, 1909.
Kidd, I. J. “Feyerabend, Science, and Scientism,” in: Bschir, K. and Shaw, J. (eds.) Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 172-190.
Kidd, I.J. “Rethinking Feyerabend: The 'Worst Enemy of Science'?” PLOS Biology, 2011, vol. 9, no. 10, e1001166. [https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001166, accessed on: 10.03.2024].
Kittler, F. “Gramophone, Film, Typewriter,” in: von Mücke, D. and Similon, P.L. (trans.) October, 1987, vol. 41, pp. 101-118.
Kurz, R. Weltordnungskrieg. Das Ende der Souveränität und die Wandlungen des Imperiums im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. Horleman, 2003.
Lakatos, I. “Falsification und die Methodologie Wissenschaftlicher Forschungsprogramme,” in: Lakatos, I., Musgrave, A. (eds.) Kritik und Erkenntnisfortschritt. Wissenschaftstheorie Wissenschaft und Philosophie, vol 9. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, 1974, pp. 89-189.
Lakatos, I. “Die Geschichte der Wissenschaft und Ihre Rationalen Rekonstruktionen,” in: Lakatos, I., Musgrave, A. (eds.) Kritik und Erkenntnisfortschritt. Wissenschaftstheorie Wissenschaft und Philosophie, vol 9. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, 1974, pp. 271-311.
Lakatos, I. “The Methodology of Scientific Programmes,” in: Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, 1970, pp. 91-195.
Lonergan, B. Method in Theology. Darton, Longman, and Todd, 1971 [1958].
Lynch, W.T. “The Challenge to Consensus: The Relevance of the Lakatos-Feyerabend Debate for Contemporary Science and Technology Studies,” Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2018, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 57-61.
Manne, K. Down Girl: Logic of Misogyny. Cornell University Press, 2017.
Martin, E. “Late Feyerabend on Materialism, Mysticism, and Religion,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2016, vol. 57, pp. 129-136.
Meyer-Abich, K. Korrespondenz, Individualität und Komplementarität. Eine Studie zur Geistesgeschichte der Quantentheorie in den Beiträgen Niels Bohrs. University of Michigan Press, 1965.
Meyer-Abich, K. Praktische Natur-Philosophie. Erinnerung an einen vergessenen Traum. Beck, 1997.
Meynell, H. “Feyerabend's Method,” The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 112, 1978, pp. 242-252.
Motterlini, M. (ed.) For and Against Method: Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend, Including Lakatos' Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. University of Chicago Press, 1999.
Motterlini, M. “Reconstructing Lakatos: A Reassessment of Lakatos' Epistemological Project in the Light of the Lakatos Archive,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2002, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 487-509.
Motterlini, M. “Professor Lakatos Between the Hegelian Devil and the Popperian Deep Blue Sea,” in: Kampis, G., Kvasz, L., and Stoltzner, M. (eds.) Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man. Kluwer, 2002, pp. 23-52.
Nietzsche, F.; F. Bornmann and M. Carpitella (eds.) Vorlesungsaufzeichnungen 1871/72-1874/75. Kritische Gesamtausgabe II4. De Gruyter, 1995, pp. 613-632.
Nietzsche, F.; G. Colli and M. Montinari (eds.) Kritische Studienausgabe. De Gruyter, 1980.
Pigliucci, M. “Review of Feyerabend's Philosophy of Nature,” Philosophy Now, 2018, vol. 126. Online: [https://philosophynow.org/issues/126/Philosophy_of_Nature_by_Paul_Feyerabend, accessed on: 10.03.2024].
Planck, M. Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers. Philosophical Library, 1950.
Riegl, A. Spätrömische Kunst-Industrie nach den Funden in Österreich-Ungarn. Kaiserlich-Königlichen Hofund Staatsdruckerei, 1901.
Riegl, A. Late Roman Art Industry. Winkes, R. (trans.) Giorgio Brettschneider Editore, 1985.
Ropolyi, L. “Lakatos and Lukács,” in: Kampis, G., Kvasz, L., and Stöltzner, M. (eds.) Appraising Lakatos. Kluwer, 2002, pp. 303-338.
Sauerländer, W. “From Stilus to Style: Reflections on the Fate of a Notion,” Art History, 1983, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 253-270.
Simiand, F. “Historical Method and Social Science,” Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 1985, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 163–213.
Suchting, W. “Rising Up from Downunder,” Inquiry, 1978, vol. 21, pp. 337-361.
Theocharis, T. & M. Psimopoulos. “Where Science Has Gone Wrong,” Nature, 333 (October 1987), pp. 61-72.
Theocharis, T. & M. Psimopoulos. “When Did The Science Wars Start?,” Physics Today, 2001, vol. 54 (10), (2001), pp. 11-12. Tsou, 2003 Tsou, J. “Reconsidering Feyerabend's 'Anarchism',” Perspectives on Science, 2003, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 208-235.
