НАУЧНАЯ РАЦИОНАЛЬНОСТЬ В СОЦИАЛЬНОМ КОНТЕКСТЕ: КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫЕ И ПРАКТИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ
Ключевые слова:
наука и общество, социальный конструктивизм, ценности, философия науки, демократизация науки
Аннотация
Предлагается обзор ряда ключевых философско-научных работ последних лет, посвященных проблеме расхождения ценностей науки и общества. Обсуждаются три основных направления реакции рациональных философов на программу социального конструктивизма, ориентированные на защиту научной рациональности от релятивистской социально-философской критики. Представлен ряд концепций по сближению исследовательских задач науки и потребностей общества, а также феминистская программа ревизии принципов управления наукой. Дано критическое рассмотрение перспектив сближения науки и общества и указаны ряд сложностей на пути реализации подобного проекта.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Литература
Berenson, A. Evidence in Vioxx Suits Shows Intervention by Merck Officials. New York Times, 2005, April 24.
Biddle, J. „Lessons from the Vioxx Debacle: What the Privatization of Science Can Teach Us About Social Epistemology", Social Epistemology, 2007, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 21-39.
Brown, J. The Rational and the Social: How to Understand Science in a Social World. London: Routledge, 1989. 212 pp.
Elliott, C. „Pharma Goes to the Laundry: Public Relations and the Business of Medical Education", Hastings Center Report, 2004, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 18-23.
Feyerabend, P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoy teorii poznaniya. . Moscow:AST, 2007. 413 pp.
Giere, R."A New Program for Philosophy of Science?", Philosophy of Science, 2003, vol. 70, no.1, pp. 15-21.
Giere, R Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2006. 170 pp.
Goldman, A. "The Foundations of Social Epistemics", Synthese, 1987, vol. 73, no.1, pp. 109-144.
Goldman, A. "Psychological, Social and Epistemic Factors in the Theory of Science", in: R. Burian, M. Forbes, and D. Hull (eds.), PSA 1994: Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 1995, pp. 277-286.
Haraway, D. Animal Sociology and a Natural Economy of the Body Politic, Parts 1 and 2. Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge,1978.
Harding, S. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1986. 296 pp.
Hesse, M. Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1980. 271 pp.
Hicks, D. J. „A New Direction for Science and Values", Synthese, 2014, vol. 191, pp. 3271-3295.
Kitcher, P. The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. 432 pp.
Kitcher, P. Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Press, 2011. 270 pp.
Kleinman, D.L.; Delborne, J.; Anderson, A.A. „Engaging Citizens: The High Cost of Citizen Participation in High Technology", Public Understanding of Science, 2009, vol 20, issue 2, pp. 221 -240.
Knorr-Cetina, K. The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford New York: Pergamon Press. 385 pp.
Kourany, J.; Fernández Pinto, M. „A Role for Science in Public Policy? The Obstacles, Illustrated by the Case of Breast Cancer Screening Policy in Science", Technology, & Human Values, 2018, vol. 43, no. 5, pp.917-943.
Kourany, J. "A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty-First Century," Philosophy of Science, 2003, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1-14.
Kuhn T. Struktura nauchnyh revolyutsiy . Moscow: Progress, 1975. 300 pp.
Kukla, R. "‘Author TBD": Radical Collaboration in Contemporary Biomedical Research", Philosophy of Science, 2012, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 845-858.
Lacey, H. Values and Objectivity: The Controversy over Transgenic Crops. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005.
Latour, B.; Woolgar, S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986. 296 pp.
Laudan, L."The Pseudo-Science of Science?", in: Brown, J. (ed.). Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1984, pp. 41-74.
Longino, H.E. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002. 288 pp.
Longino, H. „The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),
Mirowski, P., & Van Horn, R. „The Contract Research Organization and the Commercialization of Scientific Research", Social Studies of Science, 2005, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 48-503.
Pickering, A. „Elementary Particles: Discovered or Constructed?", in Trower, W.; Bellini, G. Physics in Collision: High-Energy Ee/Ep/Pp Interactions, vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press, 1992, pp. 439-448, ISBN 9780306409967
Pickering, A. „From Science as Knowledge to Science as Practice", in: Pickering, A. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, Illinois, University of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 1-28.
Pruzhinin, B.I. et.al. „Kommunikatsii v nauke: ehpistemologicheskie, sotsiokul'turnye, infrastrukturnye aspekty. Materialy „kruglogo stola’" , Voprosy filosofii, 2017, vol. 11, pp. 15-37.
Rose, H. „Hand, Brain, and Heart: A Feminist Epistemolgy for the Natural Sciences", Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1983, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 73-90.
Ross, J.; Hill, K.; Egilman, D.; & Krumholz, H. „Guest Authorship and Ghostwriting in Publications Related to Rofecoxib: A Case Study of Industry Documents from Rofecoxib Litigation", Journal of the American Medical Association, 2008, vol. 299, no. 15, pp. 1800-1812.
Shapin & Shaffer, 1985 -Shapin, S.; Schaffer, S. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985. 448 pp.
Solomon, M. Social Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. 196 pp.
Solomon, M. "Groupthink versus The Wisdom of Crowds: The Social Epistemology of Deliberation and Dissent," The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 2006, vol. XLIV, pp. 28-42.
Biddle, J. „Lessons from the Vioxx Debacle: What the Privatization of Science Can Teach Us About Social Epistemology", Social Epistemology, 2007, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 21-39.
Brown, J. The Rational and the Social: How to Understand Science in a Social World. London: Routledge, 1989. 212 pp.
Elliott, C. „Pharma Goes to the Laundry: Public Relations and the Business of Medical Education", Hastings Center Report, 2004, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 18-23.
Feyerabend, P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoy teorii poznaniya. . Moscow:AST, 2007. 413 pp.
Giere, R."A New Program for Philosophy of Science?", Philosophy of Science, 2003, vol. 70, no.1, pp. 15-21.
Giere, R Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2006. 170 pp.
Goldman, A. "The Foundations of Social Epistemics", Synthese, 1987, vol. 73, no.1, pp. 109-144.
Goldman, A. "Psychological, Social and Epistemic Factors in the Theory of Science", in: R. Burian, M. Forbes, and D. Hull (eds.), PSA 1994: Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 1995, pp. 277-286.
Haraway, D. Animal Sociology and a Natural Economy of the Body Politic, Parts 1 and 2. Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge,1978.
Harding, S. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1986. 296 pp.
Hesse, M. Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1980. 271 pp.
Hicks, D. J. „A New Direction for Science and Values", Synthese, 2014, vol. 191, pp. 3271-3295.
Kitcher, P. The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. 432 pp.
Kitcher, P. Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Press, 2011. 270 pp.
Kleinman, D.L.; Delborne, J.; Anderson, A.A. „Engaging Citizens: The High Cost of Citizen Participation in High Technology", Public Understanding of Science, 2009, vol 20, issue 2, pp. 221 -240.
Knorr-Cetina, K. The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford New York: Pergamon Press. 385 pp.
Kourany, J.; Fernández Pinto, M. „A Role for Science in Public Policy? The Obstacles, Illustrated by the Case of Breast Cancer Screening Policy in Science", Technology, & Human Values, 2018, vol. 43, no. 5, pp.917-943.
Kourany, J. "A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty-First Century," Philosophy of Science, 2003, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1-14.
Kuhn T. Struktura nauchnyh revolyutsiy . Moscow: Progress, 1975. 300 pp.
Kukla, R. "‘Author TBD": Radical Collaboration in Contemporary Biomedical Research", Philosophy of Science, 2012, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 845-858.
Lacey, H. Values and Objectivity: The Controversy over Transgenic Crops. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005.
Latour, B.; Woolgar, S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986. 296 pp.
Laudan, L."The Pseudo-Science of Science?", in: Brown, J. (ed.). Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1984, pp. 41-74.
Longino, H.E. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002. 288 pp.
Longino, H. „The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),
Mirowski, P., & Van Horn, R. „The Contract Research Organization and the Commercialization of Scientific Research", Social Studies of Science, 2005, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 48-503.
Pickering, A. „Elementary Particles: Discovered or Constructed?", in Trower, W.; Bellini, G. Physics in Collision: High-Energy Ee/Ep/Pp Interactions, vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press, 1992, pp. 439-448, ISBN 9780306409967
Pickering, A. „From Science as Knowledge to Science as Practice", in: Pickering, A. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, Illinois, University of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 1-28.
Pruzhinin, B.I. et.al. „Kommunikatsii v nauke: ehpistemologicheskie, sotsiokul'turnye, infrastrukturnye aspekty. Materialy „kruglogo stola’" , Voprosy filosofii, 2017, vol. 11, pp. 15-37.
Rose, H. „Hand, Brain, and Heart: A Feminist Epistemolgy for the Natural Sciences", Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1983, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 73-90.
Ross, J.; Hill, K.; Egilman, D.; & Krumholz, H. „Guest Authorship and Ghostwriting in Publications Related to Rofecoxib: A Case Study of Industry Documents from Rofecoxib Litigation", Journal of the American Medical Association, 2008, vol. 299, no. 15, pp. 1800-1812.
Shapin & Shaffer, 1985 -Shapin, S.; Schaffer, S. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985. 448 pp.
Solomon, M. Social Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. 196 pp.
Solomon, M. "Groupthink versus The Wisdom of Crowds: The Social Epistemology of Deliberation and Dissent," The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 2006, vol. XLIV, pp. 28-42.
Опубликован
2019-03-21
Как цитировать
Вострикова Е. В., Куслий П. С. НАУЧНАЯ РАЦИОНАЛЬНОСТЬ В СОЦИАЛЬНОМ КОНТЕКСТЕ: КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫЕ И ПРАКТИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2019. Т. 55. № 4. С. 143–159.
Раздел
Vista
